you've got your fact all wrong. they should be on the front of badger baters weekly.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:01, archived)
yyy slooowwwww....
shurley a site called 'techsupport.co.uk' should be a little quicker .. ?
edit: hmm, it's loaded fine on the refresh ...
ooops.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:01, archived)
You must be a big gay wooftah.
Although at 150k, it's a little on the heavy side.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:02, archived)
33k now better. Shouldnt be slow its on a 2 mg line but the server is only a 486 so that could be it but its usually fine.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:07, archived)
for hosting stuff posted here. Most people use a dedicated web host.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:10, archived)
do most people use then ? I use this one cos its a test machine in work. We get to play at being sys admins.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:12, archived)
and no-one feels to bad about Microsoft footing the bill. Erm, there's an MSN faq around somewhere.
(, Fri 5 Sep 2003, 12:14, archived)
