You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » We Love David Sullivan » Message 4392412

[challenge entry] He is a right ...


From the We Love David Sullivan challenge. See all 412 entries (closed)

(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 11:31, archived)
# marble column?
;)
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 11:34, archived)
# Isn't every user of B3ta a plagiarist?
the whole site works because, daily, you're all sat there in your office/bedroom stealing other people's pictures.

Don't get me wrong I'm guilty of it myself and David Sullivan is a Cunt, but a least I realise it.

If suddenly you started making money from posting on the board would you stop doing it?

Idiot
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 11:47, archived)
# but the difference
is the money .,...
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 11:49, archived)
#
Obviously, but whereas he's doing it for the money you're doing it for admiration

"Look at me, look how funny I am"

you're still gaining from it.
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 11:55, archived)
# Ahem
Given the choice I'd rather have the money.
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 12:00, archived)
# Well if we didnt
then b3ta would be a empty place.. i get what you are saying but...

its all fun, until someone looses an eye.
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 12:00, archived)
# No one
here is posting stuff done by other people and pretending it is their own. Sullivan is taking other people's work, not crediting them and making money from it.

He is a gobshite cunt.

P.S. This lurker thinks teh Beattie needs to make a comeback
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 12:08, archived)
# If you want to test the theory:



Step 1: Pick one of the better known B3tans.

Step 2: Take one of their images.

Step 3: Post it on the board.

Step 4:

Step 5: Profit.



Even without steps 4 and 5, you'd still get a good flaming. I know it isn't exactly black and white, but people around here take other peoples *dull* images and make something funny out of them. It's the creative part which makes it funny, not the original source.

Sullivan just does the proverbial leeching of our images, adds nothing *and* profits.
(, Sun 20 Mar 2005, 12:24, archived)