are the best.
Mac's don't get visrus, don't crash, don't quit underpressure. PC's do. 100% Fact.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:52, archived)
The spell checker is integrated in the OS, but if you use FireFox this neat feature is not enabled.
[Only works for Safari]
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:05, archived)
back in ONE BY ONE to get your Mac to boot up.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:55, archived)
And often.
They are no more resilient to shit software than a PC is. Face it.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:59, archived)
compared to my record of 121 on a windows machine.
And the 300 day machine is still going strong
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:10, archived)
and how much software do you run on the PC?
(and what OS on the PC?)
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:13, archived)
the Mac is an X-serve running X 10.3 server addition, but I've got comparable uptimes out of my G3 iMac running 10.1 at home (would have been more if I hadn't shut down to install 10.3).
The most stable win2k configuration I've had was just running IIS and not much else. The MSSql machines average about 10 days between unrecoverable errors, and they're hit a lot less hard
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:16, archived)
and it has crashed twice.
In the last week alone my Win XP machine has crashed 3 times. [One time so fatal that I had to disconnect the power cord to do a hard re-boot]
I am not sure what version of Mac OS you have, and on which hardware?
I have had applications crash after an upgrade when an extension was no longer compatible, mail 2.0, but the OS so rarely crashes when an application has difficulty.
[My uptime is presently 35 days. The last time I patched the OS.]
The 100% fact is that Mac OS is way more stable than Win XP. [Although Win XP beats Win 98 hollow!]
I can't wait for Windows Vista because it is an obvious clone of all of the best features of Mac OS X.
[I hope it also has the same stability too! The I will be happy at work as well as at home!]
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:15, archived)
at maintaining it. The main reason macs are seen as so much more stable is because they're idiot proofed.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:30, archived)
Seeing as I have a J2EE app server running on my mac, and JBoss and two Tomcat servers, oh, and the whole of GNU utilites courtesy of fink, and I only use my win XP machine for bittorrent, file server, DivX watching and games, and I make sure that my windows machine is virus checked and spyware removed weekly, I would expect XP to be more stable.
The fatal crash in XP occurred starting up a bittorent client. It had never crashed before, and has not since. It took out the whole OS though. Something very rare on Mac OS X.
If you mean 'idiot proof' as in 'stable' then I would agree.
It takes a 'genuine' idiot to core dump a mac.
Any idiot can crash an XP machine.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 21:00, archived)
they're such a small target people realise it's fucking pointless making them for macs.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:59, archived)
You should see the macs I have to work with...
But fair enough. PCs do have a lot of problems too, although I think since XP hit crashes aren't nearly as common as they used to be.
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:00, archived)
Yeah, I've had exactly three BSODs since I've had XP, which is a week or two after it was released.
*Acrington Stanley? 'Oo are they?
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:04, archived)
and I think it's more the fault of aging hardware than software in this case. Still, may be buying a nice Alienware laptop later this week...
I like shiny new things
(, Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:08, archived)
