
nods to Limpfish's Cherie Blair pic
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:43, archived)
and have it sticking out into the bloggy section
speaking of which, what ever happened to putting quick links in the weblog, stuff that is too simple to go into the newsletter, but deserved sharing?
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:47, archived)
but we have BIG plans. the front page re-jig is only part of something... BIGGER
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:49, archived)
I haven't worshipped a false idol for weeks....
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:02, archived)
isn't it fun pretending to be two different people.. when
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:55, archived)
I am seriously tired of it, it makes people look mean and petty.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:58, archived)
which is what it probably is anyway
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:59, archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/5159229
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:03, archived)
and then I realised you just have to laugh about these things...
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:00, archived)
I hope you didn't take any of my joking comments seriously!
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:05, archived)
NOT FUNNY!
Stop making fun of Pete and Kate.
You don't know them, so go fuck yourself.
And yes, they will see this, you asshole.
I'm sick of all the Pete jokes :(
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:11, archived)
don't comment on it.
b3ta is not the place for criticism.
beau bo d'or makes some fantastic pictures, and most of them end up on the front page. what have you accomplished in your one month of b3ta?
be nice please, people on here will love you for it.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:16, archived)
It's not a direct criticsm of your obviously favourite couple, just making a point about media portrayal. On which point it triumphs. :P
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:28, archived)
who got where he is by being controversial and a filthy fucking druggie, and not at all to do with his singing (cat going to the toilet through a sewn up arse) or his musical talent (nonexistent)and she's a semi-sentient clotheshorse who got paid a lot of money to stand there and wear clothes and she even fucked that up.
what a load of shite.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:41, archived)
describing Beau Bo d'or there ... but obviously not for he has all teh hummus.
Top work.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 13:43, archived)
or did you simply appear to rant because it's about moss and doherty?
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:56, archived)
EDIT: Looks above... bollocks, beaten to it. After looking at this fine fellows profile he's obviously just a celeb slag. WOO! You take drugs with a couple of washed out celebs... best go inform everyone on the net then!
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 10:54, archived)
HAHAHAHAHA
chill! some of quite like the Libertines; put it this way, if they weren`t so careless and hadn`t got caught, who`d be any the wiser? there`s no such thing as bad publicity (unless you`re convicted of teh paedo stuff.. or murder)
OK some bad publicity
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 11:38, archived)
we make fun of whoever the fuck we like
they're more than welcome to make fun of us back
(unless they're dead, in which case we just laugh harder)
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 12:43, archived)
why can't we do that ....?
is it really a white guilt thing or are we just scared of them (sic) really? Personally I think us honkies should be able to appropriately use n****r (see, I can't even say it here!) without fear of any nonesense
and as for sending 'em all home ...
Please discuss:
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 12:47, archived)
2. There's a reason nobody else has touched this post with a barge pole.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 19:59, archived)
2. I think it is genuinely interesting that it is acceptable (on here anyway) to take the pi$$ out of raspberries (sic), the dead and dying etc etc (see posts above) but it remains un-acceptable to use race as subject matter. When B3ta seems to specialise and rejoice in the dis-tasteful it amazes me that my post still manages to provoke such a predictable response ... sigh ...
some of my best friends are black you know ... and gay!
(, Tue 27 Sep 2005, 19:21, archived)
white.
I wonder why you assume that all the people that you've never seen in real like look the same as you?
As a modern English Black man, I don't have a problem with black jokes as long as they ARE jokes and not thinly disguised xenophobia.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 22:50, archived)
what was I mean't to have assumed ....?
I find it hard to think of any 'black jokes' that AREN'T thinly disguised xenophobia. I think the basis of a lot of humour is simply the recognition of a difference and commenting on it - thus I find it hard to imagine a 'black joke' that I wouldn't find offensive - unless you know any ????
Personally I find the Daily Mail far more offensive than anything on this site ...
Wasn't a recent topic "what if Jim Davidson was PM" or something ... let me go back and check the posts from then to see what was 'acceptable' humour and what wasn't ...
'Course its the towel heads you really gotta watch ... (oh no, I've really done it now ...)
(, Tue 27 Sep 2005, 19:52, archived)
I'm starting to wonder what that pair have done to warrant all this attention.
Their 15 minutes should've been over a year or two ago, shirley?
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 17:35, archived)
They're both usually smacked up to their tits and both act like arrogant bellends. NEXT.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 22:15, archived)
fucking woo, indeed I feel that both a "yay" and a "hoopla" may well also be in order.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 10:23, archived)
"...it's been up my arse".
Proof that I've spent far too long reading Popbitch.
Have a "woo", sir!
"Woo!"
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 10:29, archived)
top shoppage though, and I did laugh
most wooyay worthy
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 11:10, archived)
always equals a front page in my book
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 11:39, archived)
and yet it shouldn't have been fp'd.
What criteria do you think stuff should be FP'd on? If not funny and well done?
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 13:37, archived)
just making the point that there is a lot of funny and well executed stuff on b3ta that doesn't get fpd : ) To me, it matters not : )
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 18:36, archived)
just because they don't get as many fp's as they 'think' they should.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 20:31, archived)
and, reading the thread below/above, acknowledging two absolute nobodies gives 'em too much credit. I never saw ANY merit it either of them. She can, when heavily made up, look ok. He is just a TOTALLY talentless tosser (Yay for unintentional alliteration). Keep up the good work.... always/usually enjoy your stuff.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 15:05, archived)
The gormless look on his face really is quite priceless. Nice hair though.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 22:02, archived)
Could somebody explain this one to an american? I know who the chic is.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 5:04, archived)
photoshopped onto photographs of child-murderers Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, who abducted and murdered several children during the 1960s (in the UK)
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 9:15, archived)
You know, devoid of the glamour and all that which may serve to blind us - the mere masses - Kate Moss (facially speaking) isn't all that really is she?
Matter of fact I'd go as far as to say she looks downright council and a Swindon facelift (hair scraped back at 300 lb/ft tension) wouldn't look out of place.
As for Crackboy there, he's always looked like a clueless fucktard so no odds.
Happy Monday everyone!
IZM
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 10:49, archived)
finally a vision of Mira I can take to the grave with me
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 13:15, archived)
ace photo edit!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2005, 22:18, archived)
feeling looking at those pics, remind me of eraserhead.
(, Tue 27 Sep 2005, 14:11, archived)
ooh that's a bit harsh
in fact, that's more than a bit harsh
ooof.
I see what you're trying to do, but I just don't think they deserve that particular connotation...
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:45, archived)
I put it together to show how the media are treating them.
I don't like either of them and think they both deserve a kicking but they're not murderers....
although in a few years time maybe their (I emphasise their) image/lifestyle may well have contributed to someone's drug induced misery/death.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 2:58, archived)
I miss the significance of many of your posts simply because I no longer live in the UK :(
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:01, archived)
news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article314990.ece
in summary fashion model caught sniffing cocaine and druggy boyfriend
fashion model loses some contracts - still worth millions
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:07, archived)
I could see you were trying to emphasise them being in it together, but at first it looked a bit like you were comparing being fashion druggies with the abduction and murder of kids, which is what shocked me a bit
when it seems you're merely pointing out that the media are basically doing this anyway...
(forgive me for that, I've not been following the story particularly closely because of exactly that)
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:04, archived)
of Cherie Blair when she was being attacked by the press so the concept was not entirely original - hence me referring to mine as a cliche.
I used a similar concept but with both pictures/characters.
No prob - I can now understand that the pic could be taken that way.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:11, archived)
as I recall there was a full size oil painting they did of it too
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:13, archived)
but isn't there a clash in that you did the vilification pics and then do a pic taking the piss out of the vilification? Not that it matters in the great scheme of things and all : )
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:25, archived)
is that there's a difference between poking fun at the excesses of a celebrity lifestyle and full-on tabloid vilification
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:50, archived)
Doing drugs isn't just a celebrity lifestyle thing. Every fucker's at it! Tabloids don't splash 'stories' like this all over the place because they care about people's welfare or they want to set a good example to kids. They do it to flog their revolting rags, and will stop at nothing to do so. Anyone who wants to do drugs, imo, go ahead and have a great time. Just keep it amongst your circle of caners or you're going to run into problems whatever walk of life you're from. Sadly for these guys they've made it obvious and are now reaping the consequences, and whoever took the photos and sold them to the press is a disgusting little cunt who should never be able to look at themself in the mirror again. Probably some skint hanger-on needing cash for their own habit, safe in the knowledge that noone would ever give two fucks if they were pictured having a line. That said, cocaine is nasty stuff. It doesn't inspire creativity. It just makes shy people gregarious and turns confident people into cunts. And sobers you up!
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 5:40, archived)
what they've done/are doing and especially the hypocrisy of the fashion houses/PR/Marketing industry so that's why I did the earlier pics.
Some papers/commentators were asking me to feel sorry for them - some were going rabid.
Neither extreme is going to do any good.
Some will say it's hypocrisy on my part - I would disagree - but they have every right to accuse me of that.
I think the issue is now about balance.
The whole marketing influence makes me pretty angry, hence my rant a few days ago.
(I hope you don't mind my comments)
Cheers :-)
Edit - And Goodnight everyone.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 3:56, archived)
My favourite part of the whole thing is Rimmel's tagline 'break the rules'.
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:00, archived)
How the fuck you can argue coherently on such terms at this time is, and ever will be, incomprehensible to me.
/doffs hat
(, Sun 25 Sep 2005, 4:07, archived)


