Erm
Yes. I did do that, didn't I?
( Natt, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 17:58, archived)

that's very naughty
not only is it not your work, and not even photoshopped, but you are leeching it from someone elses server.
( Spoon, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:00, archived)

Oh, so that's why
I felt the compulsion to write the bit under the picture...
( Natt, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:01, archived)

yeah, but i interpreted it to mean:
'this didn't take much work'

not

'i've pinched this from someone else'
( Spoon, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:02, archived)

Thats what i read it as aswell
never mind, i wish id found it cos i would have passed it off as my own!
(100 Years of EFC, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:04, archived)

but surely
'no pshopping whatsoever' doesn't leave much room for misinterpreterisationing?
( slight yoinks!, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:04, archived)

compare:
'I've done no work today whatsoever!'

If someone said this to me, I would assume that they meant they had done very little work, not that they had not actually done any work at all
( Spoon, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:10, archived)

dunno i
reckon i'd believe em. certainly when i say that i mean literally no work whatsoever, but then i'm probably more of a layabout than your mates, so it's a fair cop.

:)
( slight yoinks!, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:25, archived)

Hope the clarification is
clear. And the new (old) picture (which only went up at four one morning) goes some way to compensating...)
( Natt, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:08, archived)

thanks for making it a link
sorry for jumping on you a bit, but I feel bandwidth theft is bandwidth theft, no matter who it is from. But then I am a picky git.
( Spoon, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:12, archived)

Absolument.
Consider the lesson thoroughly learned.
( Natt, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:13, archived)

don't worry
I think the bbc can afford the bandwidth.
;)
( Monkeyboy, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:03, archived)

point taken
but it's a line i prefer not to cross
/pious
( Spoon, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:05, archived)

You ain't from round 'ere are ya?


(yes, it's the moose again)
( Chromatically Challenged, Tue 17 Dec 2002, 18:01, archived)