NSFW pic
MOD EDIT: naked ladies spreading their legs open looks like porn - even if you have covered up the rudest bit.
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:52, archived)
but then I also reckon that the front page is clearly someones cock coming out of their pants
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:57, archived)
It's no worse really than the picture on the front where you can see a bit of someones knob
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:54, archived)
new rule for the FAQ, bits of peoples rude bits are perfectly allowed
*looks forward to hints of nipples, arse cracks and stray hairs
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:56, archived)
Therefore it is classed as SFW on b3ta. Peoples individual viewpoints on what is NSFW is quite irrelevant really.
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:57, archived)
as long as it isn't from a porno and is just an anatomical image?
Cool!
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 16:01, archived)
then that's 'safe' for work... I suppose you run a risk looking at b3ta anyway, but still.
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 16:03, archived)
It's just than nudity is very rarely done in a way that is not NSFW.
Apart from anything else - the Mario picture is complete fucking genius.
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 16:05, archived)
You shouldn't be on b3ta if you're at work. Why if I was your boss, the whip would be out and I would have you over my knee...
damn I'm kinky
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 15:58, archived)
that fact remains that that is (and, according to the new rules, looks like) pr0n... and so isn't safe for work
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 16:00, archived)
Yeah, I left my hand in the oven and burnt it. What do you reckon, whack a bit of cream on it?
/toss
(, Thu 5 Jul 2007, 16:00, archived)