If I'm wrong, I'd better know before I revise from them..:S
SCIENCE
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:00, archived)
and I can vouch that he has no distance over him.
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:07, archived)
2 and 3 look correct, but I can't be arsed to remember enough about chemistry or biology to help you on 1 and 4.
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:11, archived)
the only one I worry about is the one about hydrocarbons.
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:12, archived)
Johnny was a chemist
But his is no more
For what he thought was H2O
Was H2SO4
...but I doubt it'll help you.
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:17, archived)
1 doesn't look right to me... As it is, you're burning coal in a hydrogen+ozone atmosphere. What are you trying to represent? Generalised hydrocarbons?
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:19, archived)
CO2
and
H2O
Meaning there are three lots of oxygen in there..:S
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:21, archived)
It might make CO2 + 2H2O, using 2O2... (hint: start from methane, CH4, and work from there)
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:25, archived)
CH4 + 2 O2 = CO2 + 2 H2O
2 C6H14 + 19 O2 = 12 CO2 + 14 H2O
for example
Edit: sorry, edited. I initially used fucking ">"
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:26, archived)
I still find it somewhat confusing
because you write the component atoms of two molecules on the left side of the equation, but two molecule names on the right...
but meh
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:41, archived)
finished.
www.b3tards.com/u/1628d80a69fd3a28d054/hydrocarbons.jpg
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 18:43, archived)
erm the last one is a little wrong too, it should be the chromosomes replicate, as in they double so there are twice as many. you have put divide, which would mean there are less. you need 2x as many chromosomes so each new cell gets the right number in the end :)
(, Tue 8 Jan 2008, 19:14, archived)