You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 7938824 (Thread)

# no?
I interpret the second and third clauses as modifying the first, and the third as modifying the second..

or should one ignore the second comma?

ENLIGHTEN ME, O MASTER PEDANT
(, Thu 10 Jan 2008, 1:30, archived)
# It's not English!
It's fucking Gingerese!

Don't ask how I know this.
(, Thu 10 Jan 2008, 1:33, archived)
# you're just arguing
for the sake of it. whatever the faq says, if someone who is a board regular tells you that it means the limit is 50kb for stills, then the limit is 50kb for stills. and if you argue the point, you're technically a grammatical wanker.

and i don't care if i start sentences with 'and', because i end them with 'grammatical wanker'.
(, Thu 10 Jan 2008, 1:35, archived)
# hey, I'm not arguing, I'm discussing a matter of grammatical pedantry.
 
and no, it's not even slightly important. : )
(, Thu 10 Jan 2008, 1:39, archived)