You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8058061

# NEW IMAGE CHALLENGE - NOW ONLINE



Go Go Scientology. Scientology gets a lot of bad press, but they're not all nut-cases, and it's time the balance was redressed. So this week's challenge is to show the positive side of the Church, and sell it to outsiders. Go mental.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:45, archived)
# AND WHAT TIME DO YOU CALL THIS ?
cor !
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:46, archived)
# Late
Sorry, I was at Church.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:47, archived)
# haha. hello Fraser,
i don't think i have ever spoken to you. :D

still better late than never.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:48, archived)
# Ah... is this challenge a favour?

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:49, archived)
[challenge entry] Go!

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:46, archived)
[challenge entry] HOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO's


Excellent geezer, missed that :)
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:51, archived)
# Hahahaha!
Compo it!
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:53, archived)
# haha
very good
(, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 1:04, archived)
# I like this idea.

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:47, archived)
# it is very positive.
Happy valentines day sweetheart.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:51, archived)
# Christ
and if Prince didn't put the fear up Rob's arse
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:47, archived)
# haha!

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:48, archived)
# He tried
but he was too short to reach
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:50, archived)
# Hahahaha!

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:51, archived)
# ^this

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:54, archived)
# Yes, yes, YES!
yes!

YES
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:50, archived)
# hahaha
I'm all for mocking scientology, but you do realise they're even more litigious than Prince, right? :P
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:50, archived)
# Oh but we're not mocking,
we're showing the "positive side".
The b3ta overlords can't possibly predict how some wayward board members interpret that.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:51, archived)
# cunning indeed
but I'm pretty sure the Co$ won't make the distinction ;)
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:52, archived)
# That's true, we might get caught up in their legal scattergun,
which they use to defend their sci-fi based cult.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:55, archived)
# We will all be fair game by the end of the week
then again the number of anti-scientology things on the intertubes, would be tough for them to single one out
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:52, archived)
# well maybe they'll be too wrapped up in this 'anonymous' business to care
but we're generally far less anonymous and therefore probably an easier target
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:54, archived)
# I suggested Scientology as an image challenge
just before the whole Prince thing blew up.

On the whole, I'm quite glad that my name isn't attached to this challenge, though.

edit: www.b3ta.com/questions/imagechallenge/post98320
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:57, archived)
# ^

(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:53, archived)
# I love you Fraser.
Please retire.
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:52, archived)
# Ooh this'll be fun
I might actually do something for this one. Tom cruise's head, Prince's body...

And why is it that short celebrities are so lawsuit-prone?
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 22:52, archived)
# because
they can't find any other suits that fit
(, Wed 13 Feb 2008, 23:01, archived)