Home » Messageboard »
Graphs » Message 8183020
That's a fact

It's a thing we can't deny.
From the
Graphs challenge. See all
513 entries (closed)
(
mrpotes, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:19,
archived)
Damn.
Bindun
[hangs head in shame]
(
mrpotes, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:23,
archived)
I suspect the number of bikes
has atleast fluctuated since the release of that song too.
Providing her numbers were accurate to begin with.
Also we can't know how far from the edge we are, as we don't know, we only know how far we can see.
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:29,
archived)
Corrected lyrics
by Simon Singh
education.guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,,1581826,00.htmlWe are 13.7 billion light-years from
the edge of the observable universe,
That's a good estimate with
well-defined error bars,
Scientists say it's true, but
acknowledge that it may be refined,
And with the available information, I predict that I will always be
with you
(
charlie?, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 18:19,
archived)
Sorry to TJ:
As I have never used Imageready before, I do not know why the file I have open only shows lone layer in the "animation" panel, as I need all of them there.
What am I doing wrong?
Edit: Nevermind, I've got it now. "Make frames from layers" helps.
(
ClanSoul lives in the penthouse, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:33,
archived)
UR DOING IT WRONG.
(
Caewan SIDEWAYS fucks YOU <3, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:34,
archived)
NOT ANY MORE I'M NOT
(
ClanSoul lives in the penthouse, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:36,
archived)
OKAY, DO CONTINUE
(
mediocre FISTING FULL THROTTLE, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:49,
archived)
DON'T ENCOURAGE HIM.
(
Caewan SIDEWAYS fucks YOU <3, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:52,
archived)
I wouldn't say that 6 billion people is very accurate.
I'd need the 100mils too, for it to be slightly accurate.
(
Caewan SIDEWAYS fucks YOU <3, Sun 16 Mar 2008, 13:33,
archived)