there's fuck all wrong with it

( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:20, archived)

It's not worth a raping,
but it's a little over filesize, and it's a bit big on the screen.

A click for bigger would have worked nicely.

A kind word in the ear is the best way forward.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:22, archived)

oh for fuck sake take yer boots off

( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:23, archived)

Look, I'm playing nice as the FAQ itself recommends
There's not 'fuck all wrong with it', but it's not worth getting bitchy about either.
Just a pleasant and friendly word that it's preffered if it's a little smaller and preffereably under the filesize is all that was needed.

Some of us here are on a capped amount of bandwith and every little bit helps.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:28, archived)

you are, yes, but Evilscary seems to be venting a bit
chillax or I'll write a goodbye letter to the internet
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:31, archived)

show me where in the faq it says about Image dimensions

then go tell that fucknut Dr.Dyslexia about it :)xxx
( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:31, archived)

there is
As far as pixel size goes there is no real limit, but you will rarely need to make your image larger than 400 pixels wide. To be put on the frontpage, your image needs to be no wider than 280 pixels.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:33, archived)

you know what to do!!!

GO GO GO!!!
( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:36, archived)

oh! doc dys!
I'll tell her (him) later
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:52, archived)

doen't that mean
that it's alright in the rare occasion you need to post an image larger than 400px, say of a modified screenshot?
(Your watch is still saving for 5K but has learnt about 'nose bondage', Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:57, archived)

Heh.
Well it's mainly common sense that it'd be nice if it fits on an 800x600 screen (I think it may just about as it is now, but it's fairly close).

Dyslexia gets away with it for being persistant, it would seem.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:34, archived)

dyslexia gets away with it because he mainly posts in the gayshift.

( Barbarossa You'll only know I've left when I don't come back, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived)

Ah yes.

( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

thank fuck.

( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

a much more civilised time of day, where a 769 pixel wide picture doesn't cause half the board to have a sudden rectal prolapse.

( Cockweasle, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:50, archived)

what is this 800x600 screen?
the 90's?
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

^ haha

comp it...it's a Recession
( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

BAM!! DONE! :)

(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:53, archived)

Heh.
It's not me, no. However, I am a web developer and I'm still astonished to see how many people are viewing the web on 800x600 res.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

This is true

( Barbarossa You'll only know I've left when I don't come back, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:43, archived)

*shrug*
I can't help if people are thickos!
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:53, archived)

Thanks bud...
I don't know how to do that, otherwise I WOULD. Can a mod help out here?
(Stashie was YET AGAIN just outside the "win zone", Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:23, archived)

you're using b3ta hosting, if you want to force a click for big
you can click a little box when you upload.

you could re upload and then cut and paste the codez

EDIT: oh yeah, Prodge is right there's nothing actually wrong with it.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:25, archived)

^What he said^

( Quijibo Esq. BSc. Stop ITV! http://dontruinthecrystalmaze.com, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:26, archived)

cfb would make it unreadable without clicking
not worth it.

you could lose a 1/4 off the right without spoiling the picture though..
( Bloop Fri 16 Jul, 22:10, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:27, archived)

true that

(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:29, archived)

there is absolutely nothing wrong with you post.

( prodigy69 ecky ecky ecky ecky pitang zoop boing, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:25, archived)

crop a couple of inches off the right
and you be sub 50k and the nazis would have to leave you alone.

Although, I agree there's nowt wrong.
( Wasp Box www.waspbox.com/royal-family-calendar.htm, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:27, archived)

there's fuck all wrong with it.

( Cockweasle, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:55, archived)

^this. Well said Prod

( The Great Architect We have a REALLY big Computer, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:30, archived)