The question is
do you have the money to challenge Amazon in court?

I don't, that's why I was trying to buy a diddy 'puter for ten quid.
( Ijon Tichy, Wed 19 Mar 2003, 15:10, archived)

truth
lowly under dog loses again
( armaitus Sheep Casings!, Wed 19 Mar 2003, 15:14, archived)

i once
bought a bottom live video boxset for 5 quid at wh smiths....they argued it was mispriced, shud have been 29,99 or wotever, i argued that its your fault, sell it me for a fiver...and eventually they did...amazon should honour it the bastards
( slight wiff of cabbage, Wed 19 Mar 2003, 15:38, archived)

I definatly don't think you'll get owt
don't think you'll get owt
this is an article written after when argos made a similar
mistake
(curly_wig, Wed 19 Mar 2003, 15:50, archived)

What about the...
The Consumer Protection Act of 1987 makes it a criminal offence to give consumers a misleading price indication.

...bit

They are a bunch of Mo'Fo's
(t3d on FTLFM now http://83.149.101.8:8070/listen.pls, Mon 24 Mar 2003, 18:11, archived)

"truth lowly under dog loses again"
Very poetic. Fortune cookie?
(Monkeypuppet, Wed 19 Mar 2003, 22:22, archived)