It's interesting that Wikileaks has been conducting a campaign to try to smear Clinton,
with the kind of evidence which might usually scupper a presidential candidate's chances, and it has all just bounced off because only people voting for Trump actually care about that.
Because clearly very few people are actually FOR Clinton, they're mostly just against Trump.
She could probably kick a puppy live on CNN stating "I'm only doing this to see if most of you still hate Trump more than me!" and she'd still be better presidential material than Trump.
( , Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:14, Share, Reply)
with the kind of evidence which might usually scupper a presidential candidate's chances, and it has all just bounced off because only people voting for Trump actually care about that.
Because clearly very few people are actually FOR Clinton, they're mostly just against Trump.
She could probably kick a puppy live on CNN stating "I'm only doing this to see if most of you still hate Trump more than me!" and she'd still be better presidential material than Trump.
( , Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:14, Share, Reply)
I've always thought that had Assange and Snowden done the exact same thing under GW Bush or any other republican president they'd be hailed as heroes.
( , Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:39, Share, Reply)
( , Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:39, Share, Reply)