You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1440300 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post Sounds completey sensible.
"It should be as unacceptable to bully online as it is in the playground, as difficult to groom a young child on the internet as it is in a community, as hard for children to access violent and degrading pornography online as it is in the high street, and as difficult to commit a crime digitally as it is physically."
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 11:33, Reply)
This is a normal post meanwhile they're cutting police, teachers and social workers so all those things become easier, physically

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 11:40, Reply)
This is a normal post Rochdale

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:19, Reply)
This is a normal post are you presenting that as an argument for having fewer police, teachers and social workers?
hahaha you massive tit
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:35, Reply)
This is a normal post No. What a typically imbecilic interpretation.

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:50, Reply)
This is a normal post Online porn
played a significant role in the Rochdale abuse, I hear. It's one of the reasons for this crackdown.
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 18:29, Reply)
This is a normal post this just stinks of moral panic

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 19:11, Reply)
This is a normal post No, I have a good source.
It seems as though incest, rape and sado porn is corrupting. Who would have fucking guessed that?
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 20:50, Reply)
This is a normal post calm down Mary Whitehouse

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 21:26, Reply)
This is a normal post Mary Whitehouse
objected to strong language.
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 21:43, Reply)
This is a normal post she could have quite easily written this policy though
It's the Edwardian solution
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 22:06, Reply)
This is a normal post You're being obtuse and you know it.
You see exactly how much things have changed in a generation.

Whitehouse worried about the word "shit".

We worry now about rape, paedophilia, FGM, etc.
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 22:45, Reply)
This is a normal post my point is that this is a policy designed by a coalition of people
Those who have an interest in protecting the vulnerable but very little idea about the internet or the nature of the problem (Whitehousian social conservatives) and those who have no interest in protecting the vulnerable but are keen to promote and retain their own financial interests (Murdoch).

Therefore it a) wont work as they claim b) isnt really designed to work as they claim
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 23:00, Reply)
This is a normal post You think government operates in a bubble
But they have vast resources. The Digital Economy Act has been scrutinised, redrafted and cross-checked by people who know more about this subject than anyone in the world.

You think the media are colluding but Dacre is livid about this and Desmond is an actual porn baron. I don't know what Murdoch's line is. Neither do you.

Stop worrying. You'll still be able to get your goat porn. The point is that your children won't.
(, Sat 20 May 2017, 7:56, Reply)
This is a normal post nice sentiments - but totally unachievable
the UK gov't has no sway over any company or server operating outside the UK. Unless they are proposing to have a UK only internet. Retards
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 11:40, Reply)
This is a normal post True enough.
So you prosecute the perpetrator rather than the companies providing the services. When a drunk driver kills someone, you don't sentence the guy who sold him the petrol.
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:10, Reply)
This is a normal post Well even if you can find the "perpetrator" and tie that user to a real person
you'd then (most likely) have to extradite them to convict them for writing a comment like "Theresa's a cunt" or uploading a picture of their own cock
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:25, Reply)
This is a normal post B3ta.co.uk!!!

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:58, Reply)
This is a normal post It's a long time coming.
Trick will be protecting the vulnerable without restricting the free exchange of information.
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:01, Reply)
This is a normal post the trick will be convincing people it's for their own good

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:08, Reply)
This is a normal post Like in the real world?

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:10, Reply)
This is a normal post forget 'protecting the vulnerable'
That's just the glitter they've rolled the shite in
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 12:13, Reply)
This is a normal post The public are already behind it
Overwhelmingly so in polls
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 18:31, Reply)
This is a normal post yes, well...

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 19:13, Reply)
This is a normal post How do they decide what porn is violent / degrading?
or is that just their general way of describing all porn?
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:19, Reply)
This is a normal post A simple algorithm to see if the porn was made in Russia or Japan would suffice.

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:57, Reply)
This is a normal post They ask experts

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 18:29, Reply)
This is a normal post Sexperts?

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 20:54, Reply)
This is a normal post that quotation really shows their ignorance

(, Fri 19 May 2017, 13:50, Reply)