The London Metro. FML
The only two words that don't fail me on this occasion are these: "disgracefully trivial".
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 9:58, Share, Reply)
The only two words that don't fail me on this occasion are these: "disgracefully trivial".
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 9:58, Share, Reply)
Quite right
You look at the blank eyes and slack jaws of people reading it. I somehow find solace in the knowledge that at least the London Lite and thelondonpaper are no longer jostling for that same bottom rung of the journalistic ladder these days. I ask colleagues why they pick the Metro up in the morning and get the answer "It's something to read". When I try to explain that it's nothing but sensationalised tosh (if it doesn't have "MURDER", "RAPE" or "PAEDO" in the headline, it ain't going in) and "stories" invented by PR companies, and suggest they read a book or do something else, I get called a cynical bastard. Oh well.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:11, Share, Reply)
You look at the blank eyes and slack jaws of people reading it. I somehow find solace in the knowledge that at least the London Lite and thelondonpaper are no longer jostling for that same bottom rung of the journalistic ladder these days. I ask colleagues why they pick the Metro up in the morning and get the answer "It's something to read". When I try to explain that it's nothing but sensationalised tosh (if it doesn't have "MURDER", "RAPE" or "PAEDO" in the headline, it ain't going in) and "stories" invented by PR companies, and suggest they read a book or do something else, I get called a cynical bastard. Oh well.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:11, Share, Reply)
erm...its free its to read on public transport...
and theres nothing worse than the
"IM MORE CLEVER THAN YOU YOUR READING RUBBISH"
all i do when someone says that is think "yes i know, i don't care, i don't think that Die hard is the height of cinematography either...."
Your really that concerned about what someone else is reading?
If anyone suggested to me that I should "read a book" i would insert one into them followed by "yeah your right...i have no idea what im doing with that"
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:40, Share, Reply)
and theres nothing worse than the
"IM MORE CLEVER THAN YOU YOUR READING RUBBISH"
all i do when someone says that is think "yes i know, i don't care, i don't think that Die hard is the height of cinematography either...."
Your really that concerned about what someone else is reading?
If anyone suggested to me that I should "read a book" i would insert one into them followed by "yeah your right...i have no idea what im doing with that"
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:40, Share, Reply)
TBH
I only read Nemi, then use it to prop up my phone whilst I watch dodgy downloaded US TV shows for an hour on the train.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:47, Share, Reply)
I only read Nemi, then use it to prop up my phone whilst I watch dodgy downloaded US TV shows for an hour on the train.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:47, Share, Reply)
Your point is valid. It's no business of mine what someone else is reading, i got side-tracked and thank you for getting me back in my groove. 99% of my gripe is the shit that people are tricked into accepting as 'news' by these papers and wonder if it has a positive or negative effect on society as a whole. I was sure there are people who don't take it seriously, but then Leona Lewis won that award...
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:48, Share, Reply)
it fucks me off too then...
but then your just angry all the time...
i try to see it as some Dada-ist absurdism...like taking Acid and watching question time...
there are people who take it seriously... but i dont like to spend my thoughts on them...
and sorry for the harsh tone... i got a bit prickley
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:55, Share, Reply)
but then your just angry all the time...
i try to see it as some Dada-ist absurdism...like taking Acid and watching question time...
there are people who take it seriously... but i dont like to spend my thoughts on them...
and sorry for the harsh tone... i got a bit prickley
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:55, Share, Reply)
That's a good solution.
Like Aldous Huxley when he was taken for a drive whilst tripping on mescaline.
Now if you have any suggestions for people listening to their music too loudly on trains, and middle-lane-hogging motorway morons, i'd be very much obliged to you as well.
Thank 'ee
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:31, Share, Reply)
Like Aldous Huxley when he was taken for a drive whilst tripping on mescaline.
Now if you have any suggestions for people listening to their music too loudly on trains, and middle-lane-hogging motorway morons, i'd be very much obliged to you as well.
Thank 'ee
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:31, Share, Reply)
shoot them in the fucking face
full stop...
LEARN TO DRIVE ON THE FUCKING MOTORWAY
AND STOP LISTENING TO YOUR CHILDRENS MUSIC AT FULL WHACK
DAmmit...you got me
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:39, Share, Reply)
full stop...
LEARN TO DRIVE ON THE FUCKING MOTORWAY
AND STOP LISTENING TO YOUR CHILDRENS MUSIC AT FULL WHACK
DAmmit...you got me
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:39, Share, Reply)
And never, never, never hold back.
I'd brick their fucking windows and drive their fucking Renault Scenic's (cos it's always them) up their arseholes.
I've got myself...
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 12:49, Share, Reply)
I'd brick their fucking windows and drive their fucking Renault Scenic's (cos it's always them) up their arseholes.
I've got myself...
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 12:49, Share, Reply)
worst by far are those who "police" the motorway
im doing 70... i will not let you pass
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 13:46, Share, Reply)
im doing 70... i will not let you pass
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 13:46, Share, Reply)
Oh fuck a duck...
...the "traffic jam fixers" are another breed. Those who, in gridlocks, let a 100yrd gap develop between them and the car in front so they can possibly keep up a steady pace for the rest of the traffic behind them. One small problem...that gap just gets filled by cunts in the other lanes. Back to square one with you, you arse.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 16:39, Share, Reply)
...the "traffic jam fixers" are another breed. Those who, in gridlocks, let a 100yrd gap develop between them and the car in front so they can possibly keep up a steady pace for the rest of the traffic behind them. One small problem...that gap just gets filled by cunts in the other lanes. Back to square one with you, you arse.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 16:39, Share, Reply)
To be fair,
the cinematography in Die Hard is pretty amazing.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:06, Share, Reply)
the cinematography in Die Hard is pretty amazing.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:06, Share, Reply)
i havent read any books...
i just keep inserting them into people...i think that is where i am going wrong!
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:55, Share, Reply)
i just keep inserting them into people...i think that is where i am going wrong!
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:55, Share, Reply)
"Your really that concerned about what someone else is reading?"
No man is a pamphlet entire of itself; every man is a chapter on the shelves, a part of a book; if a leaf be blown away by the wind, the library is the less, as well as if a literary classic were, as well as if a biography of thy friends or of thine own were; any man's dearth of reading diminishes me, because I am involved in readerkind. And therefore never send to know for whom the page turns; it turns for thee.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 20:00, Share, Reply)
Well that looks like a tampered vote to me
Looking at the vote shares, she's so far ahead of anyone else.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:05, Share, Reply)
Looking at the vote shares, she's so far ahead of anyone else.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:05, Share, Reply)
You're surprised?
Have you not ever interacted with humans? The majority of them are as thick as pigshit.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:06, Share, Reply)
Have you not ever interacted with humans? The majority of them are as thick as pigshit.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:06, Share, Reply)
Yeah, this is very true.
An IQ of 100 is far from bright, and 50% of humanity is below this. Of the remaining 50%, most are within the range of 100-110, and that's not smart either. By the time you get to an IQ of 120+ (which is pretty high), you're looking at about 5% of the population.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:10, Share, Reply)
An IQ of 100 is far from bright, and 50% of humanity is below this. Of the remaining 50%, most are within the range of 100-110, and that's not smart either. By the time you get to an IQ of 120+ (which is pretty high), you're looking at about 5% of the population.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:10, Share, Reply)
U dun confuzed me wit wurds n numbahs
*flings own faeces at screen*
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:20, Share, Reply)
*flings own faeces at screen*
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:20, Share, Reply)
weee! I must be some kind of super human!
last time I was checked mine was something like 140, I take it that's good then? I thought clever people were up in the 180s
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:39, Share, Reply)
last time I was checked mine was something like 140, I take it that's good then? I thought clever people were up in the 180s
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:39, Share, Reply)
If you're in the 180s, you're probably fictional.
Anything over 120 is damn good (it's within -IIRC- the top 5-10% of humanity).
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:45, Share, Reply)
Anything over 120 is damn good (it's within -IIRC- the top 5-10% of humanity).
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:45, Share, Reply)
The way they test it is a bit weird
I always get something in the 140s too, but I'm a bit sceptical.
Yes, though, 140 is meant to be very good.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:42, Share, Reply)
I always get something in the 140s too, but I'm a bit sceptical.
Yes, though, 140 is meant to be very good.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 11:42, Share, Reply)
who?
You'd think Thatcher might have had a little more influence than that wannabe media whore
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:21, Share, Reply)
You'd think Thatcher might have had a little more influence than that wannabe media whore
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 10:21, Share, Reply)
The question was
Who is your 'favourite' influential woman. The headline is misleading. Still bollocks for voting Leona Lewis anyway, but still.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 12:08, Share, Reply)
Who is your 'favourite' influential woman. The headline is misleading. Still bollocks for voting Leona Lewis anyway, but still.
( , Tue 24 May 2011, 12:08, Share, Reply)