Due to unprecedented demand from all b3ta users (see post below)...
NSFW
I made this!
From www.VilePervert.com - VILE PERVERT: THE MUSICAL, a 96 minute full length feature film of deep intellectual value and social significance.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 8:04, Reply)
'its what paedophiles do to let other paedophiles, in the vacinity,...
...know who or what is around'
looks rather like someone doing the funky chicken whilst tap dancing
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 10:29, Reply)
"96 minutes of deep meaning"
well if its 96 minutes of watching you being unable to sing and wearing various dodgy disguises then i think i'll pass... anyone for this.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7jVnrfoZD8
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 10:39, Reply)
oh
fuck off nonce face
(
the RAND corporation a.k.a. Kevin Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Fri 9 May 2008, 8:45,
Reply)
You only come on here to push your egotistical agenda
Which, aside from anything else, makes this:
(
Monty Propps, Fri 9 May 2008, 9:00,
Reply)
Yes, this^^, definately, with proof
Mr King's video has been placed on here purely for cynical advertising purposes, and its worked. He knew exactly what would happen.
As he says on his own site: "Rob, who runs it, is well aware that I like to goad his readership and this one, as expected, has unleashed a tidal wave of tabloid bile!
And, of course, a huge leap in views.
Some get the message and see the point (and actually listen to the lyrics) but most just charge like blind, bloodied bulls at the poised sword.
It appears perfectly aimed at the closet (and not so closet) homophobes who get drunk, wolf whistle women, glaze over with lust at teenage girls (preferably topless) and spit acid at anyone who admires teenage boys."
So lets do ourselves a favour and just ignore his future posts.
(
kfk I get all my everything right here, Sat 10 May 2008, 3:30,
Reply)
You might eventually notice
Folks here aren't enamored by men who hurt children for kicks.
(
mookay immune to icons since, Fri 9 May 2008, 10:05,
Reply)
Burnt face man has new episodes
Just to change teh subject from this guys shite
(
Furness, Fri 9 May 2008, 11:47,
Reply)
how's it feel to have never done ANYTHING good?
(
grey kid is breakdancing to save a community centre, Fri 9 May 2008, 10:27,
Reply)
slagging off this baw faced cock
didn't one of his programs have that lovely girl... can't remember her name, voice was a bit screechy, but she was tops. Well, I am relying on my almost non-existent memory for this, but yes, I'm prepa.... JENNI! That was her name. Bit scrawny, but she was lovely. Sorry, that's it... I'm spent.
Mr King, however, is a grade A twat. He's clearly never spent a day in his getting a feel for the b3ta vibe clearly, squint mouthed weirdo....
(
normix, Fri 9 May 2008, 21:07,
Reply)
Jenny Powell is who you're thinking of.
At least she was safe from that kid-fucking shitmitten.
(
Bingowings 2011 Businessman of the Year (Watford Branch), Fri 9 May 2008, 21:32,
Reply)
Could some one tell me what's going on here?
Is the man who made this actually a pedophile?
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess, Fri 9 May 2008, 11:10,
Reply)
for info:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_King
and in his own words
www.kingofhits.co.uk/content/view/6/24/
(
The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on, Fri 9 May 2008, 11:15,
Reply)
blatently so
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/nov/21/childprotection.society
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 11:16, Reply)
I believe so . . .
and I'm told he's done time for it too.
(
Mrs Legless . . . belongs to, well, you know . . . :), Fri 9 May 2008, 11:29,
Reply)
well, he's appealing
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaUkt59vY1Q
I don't condone paedophilia, but the issue seems far from being clear to me and I might be obviously wong.
I remember though reading somewhere that one issue was the differce in the age of consent for heterosexuals and homosexuals. If it's a crime just because it's among men, then it clearly discriminatory of one's sexual identity.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 16:40, Reply)
This is not the place to slag off other members' work. If you don't like it, don't say anything, and don't click "I like this".
Well, in this case, I'm afraid it is.
This song seeks to spread the paedophile's view that the kids enjoy it really.
They are too young to make that sort of decision, a decision you Mr King are deciding to force on them.
So, yes, there's everything wrong with buggering boys. And girls.
(
chthonic, Fri 9 May 2008, 11:33,
Reply)
Maybe, but it's not funny coming from an actual sex offender.
It's a bit like white people trying to use the N word affectionately. After serving time for a Klan lynching.
(, Sun 11 May 2008, 21:14, Reply)
King was convicted and received a seven year prison sentence for four indecent assaults and two other sexual offences against 14 and 15 year old boys committed between 1983 and 1989.
(
fegg ..next to Mr Waddilove, stinking of shit., Fri 9 May 2008, 11:48,
Reply)
On youtube he says "over the age of consent"
but that's not what he was convicted of doing. And 'boy' is a strange word to use for referring to males over the age of consent.
(
chthonic, Fri 9 May 2008, 16:14,
Reply)
Aye, could so easily have used the word 'guys' instead as well, but I guess that wouldn't have got this strange man as much attention...
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 17:38, Reply)
Dear Mr King,
The fact that you have the ordacity to even show your face, nevermind the unsuccessful attempt to make light of the quite frankly heinous crime for which you were convicted says to me that you should never have been released.
The psychological scars inflicted on your victims will very probably never fully heal, and the fact that you of all people are willing to sit there in your fucking Gandalf hat and act as if you've done nothing wrong is bewildering. On the off chance that the boys you molested have now decided that they are infact gay they still (under their own free will at least) wouldn't have wanted to suck on your decrepid old cock or lick your shrivelled balls.
I'm not usually one to promote censorship of any kind, and this goes tenfold in the case of the Internet, however in your case I believe an exception should be made. You are a despicable excuse for a human being, who in my opinion should still be locked away where you clearly belong.
What sort of delusional cretin makes a musical when they can't fucking sing? You are a talentless reject, shunned by society, hated by the masses and a failure in everything you've ever attempted to do in your entire life. I wonder how it feels to wake up every morning secretly knowing, but unable to admit that to yourself. When you look at yourself in the mirror, the person looking back at you is a waste of the oxygen you breathe, the food you consume and the clothes (however outlandishly shit they are) you wear. There is in fact something very wrong with buggering boys Mr King. The fact is that you are either too sick in the head, or too burried under the mountain of your own self denial to realise it.
Now I hope I speak for the vast majority, if not every b3tan here when I tell you that the day you fall off the mortal coil and remove yourself from the gene pool will be a day of celebration. While you probably have a long and sickening life ahead of you, I for one hope your b3ta days are numbered. And with that, you are firmly IGNORED
(
Furness, Fri 9 May 2008, 12:19,
Reply)
Now where is that 'I like this' link when you need one
(
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this, Sat 10 May 2008, 11:19,
Reply)
You absolute shit.
And no, I'm not slagging off your work, I'm insulting you. You complete and utter fuck.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 12:46, Reply)
Haha!
"Due to unprecedented demand from ALL B3ta users"
He really is delusional.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 12:52, Reply)
I think this condition sums his behaviour up well:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder
(
Monty Propps, Fri 9 May 2008, 12:57,
Reply)
Everyone hates you
And, though you won't admit it, you hate yourself too.
(
Fishcat Difficult difficult lemon difficult., Fri 9 May 2008, 12:58,
Reply)
Ha ha, I simply can't believe this is happening.
(
Mr Gear the gay-maker, Fri 9 May 2008, 16:06,
Reply)
I hope
you perish in the most painfull way possible, in a manner befitting of all
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 16:35, Reply)
your mother must be proud.
(
Gerbilinafishtank Gerbil in a fish tank...TURTLE POWER!, Fri 9 May 2008, 16:40,
Reply)
Wow, everyone hates paedophiles.
If it was out of context and I thought you meant boys as in young men, then I would probably like the song. In context, it takes distasteful to a new extreme. I guess I don't really need to add to the above name calling.
Other b3tans - why the personal abuse? Surely, there's plenty of sound logical reasons to criticize the message of this song?
Buggering young boys is wrong because it's bad for them! It can be traumatic and can cause terrible emotional problems later in life.
Paedophiles argue the point about whether or not a younger teen is able to give consent, and what the moral difference is between paedophilia and child-molestation, etc. But as far as I know, they just argue from self-indulgent opinion, and are not backed up by any studies or scientific thinking. Even if you're not satisfied with the existing evidence, everyone should be happy with a better safe than sorry approach.
How can anyone be 100% sure based on no evidence that having sexual relationships with a child isn't going to hurt them? There must be even the tiniest little niggling doubt that you just _want_ to believe that, and in fact you might be wrong? If you have any doubt, then obviously you shouldn't do it. Ultimately, if you want to bugger young boys _so much_ that you're willing to risk their well being, then you are self-absorbed to level of being a sociopath. If you want to shag someone so much that you'll risk hurting them forever, then you're not a suitable partner for _anyone_.
Adults are complicated, crazy and often quite horrible, especially when they are in love or lust. How can anyone believe that the mind of a child would be capable of dealing with that?
Would anyone think that it was a good idea to get into a boxing match with a child? Even if the kid thought it was a good idea at the time? I've been hurt far, far worse by my past relationships than my past boxing matches.
In short, _stop_ _buggering_ _boys_.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 17:13, Reply)
I agree on all points.
However you framed the question in moral terms, whereas the issue is about the law.
And it's hard or even impossible to define a uniform from which age a person is able to fully appreciate the consequences of or make an informed voluntary decision to engage in sexual activities.
So arbitrary age limits have been set for that. And it's clearly puzzling that the age of consent is 13 in Spain (lowest in Europe and raised from 12 in 1999) and 18 in other places.
A person can therefore be a paedophile in the UK but not in Spain for having sex with the one and same person. A monster and a perfectly normal individual at the same time, just by traveling a few kilometers.
One has to admit that this doesn't make much sense.
/edit: Oh, and before I start getting death threats for being a paedophilia supporter (which I'm not), I would just like to stress that my issue is not paedophilia: it's hypocritical and arbitrary laws.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 18:18, Reply)
Fine, lets make the issue about the law.
Different nations and cultures have different laws to reflect the values and traditions upheld by those nations. As a result, by travelling from country to country it is unavoidable that certain laws will conflict or contradict laws of other nations. This does not make them hypocritical. It just means that a specific culture regards a certain issue differently to another, a concept that I suppose helps define one culture from another.
The fact is that as a member of the British public this man was subjugated under British laws, morals and values of which he willingly broke. The fact that he wouldn't have been seen to have been doing anything wrong in Spain is completely invalid as an argument since he wasn't in Spain.
While I accept your view that "it's hard or even impossible to define a uniform from which age a person is able to fully appreciate the consequences of or make an informed voluntary decision to engage in sexual activities" and that it is ludicrous that hetersexual and homosexual ages of consent are not the same, you must admit that the thirteen year age of consent in Spain seems very low. For my mind I would like to think that 16 is round about the right age.
I think it would be fare to say that a lot of early teens are confused about their sexuality. Does this make it right for a preditory old man to molest them to see if they like it? Now I'm a great believer in giving people the benefit of the doubt. I think that once you've served the sentence for your crime you should be free to get on with your life. However, this man has clearly no remorse for what he did, and evidently believes that he did nothing wrong.
He in his own words would have you believe that he is making a valid point about the political hypocracy surrounding homosexuality by highlighting the homophobia suffered by Oscar Wilde. Quite how he expects to do this by dressing like Lawrence Llewellyn Bowen I've no idea but is creating a song that trivialises his own sexual abuse of children the way to do that?
(
Furness, Fri 9 May 2008, 19:13,
Reply)
The problem I have
is that we say that there is a specific developmental age below which a person suffers psychological damages from a sexual encounter, and hence makes every sexual activity with a person below that age immoral (as one person is gaining pleasure at the cost of another). Because of this, we establish a law to protect people below that age.
All this fine with me.
Except that we obviously have no idea what precise chronological age corresponds to this developmental age or how this might work for different people.
So we establish an arbitrary age, mostly based on our personal perception and morals. And this is what I object to. If there is a scientific basis for it: I'm the first to back it. If it's someone's ideas or morals, I don't think it should interfere with how consenting people interact with each other.
And willingly breaking morals or values (and even stupid laws, think homosexuality) is all fine with me, as long as it doesn't cause or potentially cause harm to other people.
For the rest, I agree with you that 13 seems very low (16 seems reasonable) but it's only my impression and it still would be nice to have a more objective view.
Molesting and exploiting are crimes, independently of age.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 20:07, Reply)
But then...
I dont think age necessarily plays a factor in the psychological damages suffered from a sexual encounter. Rape victims for example suffer long term psychological problems regardless of their age. The fact is that everyone is their own individual and as such develop at different times.
There are admittedly many 14 year olds who feel that they are mature enough and are ready to have sex, but the fact is that there are also many that aren't. The law as an ideal is meant to be there to protect the innocent and as such the focus should always be on protecting those that aren't ready. Through this notion it has been decided that 16 is an age where the vast majority of people are ready to experiment sexually. That isn't to say that many aren't ready before that age, but in order to protect the ones that aren't a proper limit has to be set. I'd love to know what your alternative to that would be. By your logic it would seem that if an 11 year old decided they were ready and had gone through puberty, then he or she would be fare game. After all, if theres grass on the wicket, lets play cricket.
At the end of the day we could argue about the pedantics of the law forever and a day, and probably never agree. The fact is an old man is singing about how he loves to bugger children and sees nothing wrong in doing so, a mind set that I find morally reprehensible
(
Furness, Sat 10 May 2008, 0:56,
Reply)
It's not just a matter of an absolute age cut-off though
Power differences have an equally huge impact on capacity to consent. There is a massive difference between two fifteen year-olds sleeping together, and a fifteen year old and a thirty year old.
(, Mon 12 May 2008, 18:55, Reply)
"There's nothing wrong with buggering boys"
... clearly there is, seeing as you did time for it.
PS: When you open your mouth it looks like you've had a stroke.
(
Irregular Shed is trying to remember what it is he does, Fri 9 May 2008, 17:17,
Reply)
ooh
had a stroke - he had more than a stroke, that was the problem! ;)
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 18:32, Reply)
This guy needs a serious reality check...
I can't believe that a man who has been convicted for sexual offences against children can so very happily advertise his perversion to all and sundry without any remorse.
You sir, are one sick individual.
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 17:27, Reply)
hahaha
I don't need to add anything that's already been said by my respectable friends up ^there, except:
There IS nothing wrong with buggering boys.
There IS however something very wrong with buggering underage boys. Adding to this wrong is writing a song that suggests it isn't, after being convicted of the same.
Balls, my man.
Cast iron.
Size of coconuts.
(
Dixipoos Bye Bye Blackbird, Fri 9 May 2008, 18:40,
Reply)
I am the Paedofinder General
And I find you..
Guilty!
Guilty!
Guilty!!!!
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 18:48, Reply)
A true cunt!
Don't ever cross my path you sick fuck - because I'd rip you a new asshole!
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 19:31, Reply)
jesus i hate this man!!!!!!
everyone knows someone who has been affected by what this vile man tries to trivialise in a pointless (and completely shit) song! im sure im not alone in wishing him a slow painfull death
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 20:57, Reply)
newsletter?
I love beta, but i dont think we should be supporting this cunt.
(
Kung_Fu_Russ ran out of amusing signatures on, Fri 9 May 2008, 21:09,
Reply)
hmmm..
i'd say the inclusion in the email is more to point out
a) that king is a cunt of the highest order (for those who don't already know)
b) that right thinking people (by which i mean b3tans - irony?) in no way support his actions - or, in some cases, his existence.
c) that the abuse he has received is both justifiable and, on occasion, amusing
that said, the less i see of him, the better...
(
hubris, Fri 9 May 2008, 22:05,
Reply)
The man for whom the word "twunt" was invented
1.It's important to remember cunts like this exist.
2.I'm offended by the fact he's brought Oscar into it.
3. It's been a long day at work and I can only talk in bullet-points.
4. Burn him!
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 22:42, Reply)
I'd happily try and straighten his fucking lop sided face with the aid of a baseball bat and some industrial chemicals
...and as for all this "haha you're all too stupid to understand" - absolute bollocks. Most people understand that he is a cunt
now please go and die
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 15:09, Reply)
but it's like...
we are giving him publicity and encouraging him.
(
Kung_Fu_Russ ran out of amusing signatures on, Sat 10 May 2008, 18:54,
Reply)
are you taking the fucking piss?
(
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since, Fri 9 May 2008, 21:41,
Reply)
No, there's absolutely nothing wrong with being gay.
There is, however, many things wrong with fucking children. Everything about it is wrong, in fact.
I believe the phrase you're looking for is 'my, that backfired a bit.'
I'd say that's about right.
(
Captain Wow currently being a cunt in Infamous, Fri 9 May 2008, 22:30,
Reply)
vile pervert? very appropriate....
I lasted 28 seconds.
I want to smack this guy in the face over and over and over and over again.
Do us all a favour, and FUCK. OFF.
There are genuine people out there who are innocent of crimes they are charged with. I bet they don't make musicals about their actions and parade it on the internet for everyone else to see!
And you're applying for an appeal?!!?!?
I hope they see this video you dumb cunt and you get locked up for the rest of your sad, meaningless existance you sick sick fuck.
And I also shake my fist at gandalf. *shakes*
(, Fri 9 May 2008, 23:51, Reply)
Trolled
Maybe I'm out of line but I think those of you who have called for this "man's" censorship have been trolled. Of course buggering boys is wrong, but certainly this creepy motherfucker's video could only serve to reinforce that point. Who could possibly see this and think, "Fuck yeah, I gotta get me some of that?"
Let everyone see it, IMO, to see just how ugly these douchebags are, but for fucks sake don't get upset about it. The troll feeds on your rage.
(
Pee-Bob, Sat 10 May 2008, 1:43,
Reply)
what
a twunt, spam it may be but in light of what he actually did is just bizarre, does he actually want to get beaten?
(
kahuna Mangled-at-the-bottom-of-the-cliff, Sat 10 May 2008, 11:09,
Reply)
Love it! Goad the closet homophobes!
Poke the poor brain dead animals through the bars. All those tabloid readers who "Support Our Boys" for killing foreigners, lust after teenage girls but think dirty gay sex is disgusting.
Isn't it fun to watch them react without thinking?
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 12:51, Reply)
boys.. girls.. it doesn't matter
The age does matter, however, and the fact is that you're a convicted paedo, and pretty much everyone hates you for that, not your choice of gender.
(
spatuluk, Sat 10 May 2008, 13:53,
Reply)
Your victims and their families like the musical, right? You could call them up and get some glowing endorsements to quote on the website? Are you on good terms with most of your adolescent 'exes'?
Because I'm sure a guy into mutually positive, non-exploitative relationships such as yours will have no trouble getting some rave reviews from some of those kids you've buggered who presumably have no regrets at all.
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 20:56, Reply)
Ah Mr King. How are you?
I would be more than willing to debate this issue with you without the petty name calling and malice that I'm sure you receive on a daily basis and as such have become both accustomed and immune to. Quite the contrary to your beleaguered repost, I have thought long and hard about the issue you have raised.
The fact is, you can call people closet homophobes all you want and for the most part you probably have a good point. A lot of people (myself included) treat homosexuals differently to the way they treat heterosexuals of the same age. Before you start calling me homophobic, allow me to elaborate. I for one didn't realise I did this until tonight when I was discussing the issue with a friend. He pointed out that my attitude to a 15 year old girl having sex with a man was different to my attitude of a 15 year old boy doing the same. This at first was difficult for me to accept, since I had always thought of myself as being belligerently accepting of all sexual orientations. However, as I’ve thought further into the issues brought about by your quite frankly piss poor attempt at musical theatre I have come to realise that it is not my attitude towards homosexual relationships that need to change, but rather my attitude towards the heterosexual. As a result, quite conversely it appears as though I have somehow held homosexuality at a higher moral stand point than that of heterosexuality.
As I have said in earlier posts, the age of consent is wide open for debate. The age at which a person feels they are ready to engage in their sexual journey in life differs from person to person and as such a lot of people feel that there is some sort of grey area around that age. However, the fact is that the law is the law. While a society that would not completely socially condemn a man for sleeping with a 15 year old girl, and yet at the same time treat a man who sleeps with a 15 year old boy as a paedophile is clearly wrong, it is not the attitude toward the homosexual relationship here that needs to change. Rather than being a homophobic issue as you would like to believe, it is instead an issue of sexism. Society has a whole appears to believe that women are more of a sexual object than men, and as such should be ready to receive a good ploughing as soon as possible. An unsaid belief that is clearly wrong. At the end of the day the age of consent was put in place for a reason, and you knowingly and willingly broke that. The defence you offer merely aids a feminist cause and does nothing to make you seem like any less of a sick fuck.
I would genuinely be interested in your thoughts on this, and hope you respond
(
Furness, Sun 11 May 2008, 2:37,
Reply)
Quite right Furness
It is clearly not only wrong but illegal to have sex with anyone below the age of consent.
It is not wrong to have consensual sex with males or females who are above the age of consent and want to do so.
That's what the song clearly says.
Some people however prefer to hear something else.
A little demon in their souls.
But no matter how often it is pointed out they will never hear the truth.
Intellectual and emotional deafness.
(, Sun 11 May 2008, 16:10, Reply)
If you know that it's wrong and illegal
and that the message of the song is to wait for "boys" to reach the age of consent, then why did you fail to follow your own advice when you were jailed in 2001 for four indecent assaults and two serious sexual offences on boys aged 14 and 15?
People aren't being homophobic when they criticise you. They just don't like paedophiles, regardless of their sexual orientation.
At the end of the day you're free to post whatever you want, but are you really that evil that you don't care what your victims will feel if they stumble across this? I imagine you've fucked up enough lives for one life time, how about fading into obscurity and letting these people try and get on with theirs.
(
Rusty Shackleford www.junt.co.uk / @joeyrobbo, Mon 12 May 2008, 14:03,
Reply)
Your mediocre song might have made a fleeting reference to it yes,
but the main focus on it was that its ok to bugger boys, and a boy is any male aged from 16-17ish all the way down to 1.
Speaking of intellectual and emotional deafness, I'll just take full blown deafness if I have to listen to that again.
Anyway I can't be arsed with you anymore, so I'm going to refer you back to my first post with a gung-ho FUCK OFF
(
Furness, Mon 12 May 2008, 22:18,
Reply)
Is
it really completely beyond your ken why some of us might suspect your motives? That perhaps your insistence that the first line means "they've got to be legal" rings a bit hollow to us, given your recent history?
What about the line "don't startle the horses or make too much noise"? Are we to believe you think boy-buggering ought to be done furtively? Is it your belief that a relationship that must be kept secret from all the boy's loved ones is likely to be a mutual, healthy relationship?
Madame Arcati's review was all true; you've raised some legitimate points about inequity in the law, and you've poked fun at some people who needed poking fun at. I acknowledge it on the merit of its postmodern artistic value, and I'll defend to the death your right to create it.
The fact that you have exercised that right in this way proves only that you have a profound lack of moral maturity. Adults care about the effects of their words and actions. An adult would see that the aforementioned right is outweighed by your debt to the people you've harmed.
Since it's clear that you plan on reoffending, I hope your inevitable incarceration meets with a clerical error that lands you in the general prison population. I hope you are raped mercilessly and beaten to within an inch of your life before the administrators figure out their mistake. I hope the entire brutal ordeal ends up on YouTube, set to your charming song.
Now THAT would be worthy of the newsletter.
Fuck along now.
(, Tue 13 May 2008, 0:52, Reply)
tosser
Dear Jonathon, you manky old spunker, its great that you have published your work in a public forum, i'm sure when you go down to sign on to the sex offenders register each week they will be pleased to see that you are taking your law breaking antics seriously. i'm also glad that the next time you are in court for dragging your decrepid old ball sack over some innocent teenager, the court will have a charicture reference of how you haven't learned your lesson and indeed laugh at the law.
anyway you talentless fat wanker, i have to go busy myself posting your charming video on as many anti paedo vigilanty sites as I can whilst also searching for your address.
good luck with the lynch mob, I hope they go at your genitals with a belt sander and some TCP before jamming a hot poker up your arse sideways you fat degenerate cunt, why don't you just kill yourself.
(, Tue 13 May 2008, 13:34, Reply)
You're wrong but
even if you were right, there is a huge difference between "lusting" and taking.
Just because there are a pair of tits on page three does not make every tabloid reader an old lech like you.
Your campaign is merely trying to justify crimes from decades ago, trying to persuade the modern freethinkers that you actually helped those boys discover their sexuality whilst surrounded by a world of blue-collar Johns who "think dirty gay sex is disgusting". This is not the case. What you did was fulfil your own sexual needs, you didn't help anyone and you're not standing up for homosexuality at all. Why don't you go and actually ask a gay person what they'd prefer - To discover their own sexuality on their own in their own time, or have some dirty crooked old man mess with them before they're ready for any sexual encounter at all.
(, Sun 11 May 2008, 12:12, Reply)
Ages late, I realize
and likely never to be seen again
but as a homosexual, I believe I may rightfully assume that I am not a 'closet homophobe'
and I reacted without thinking as well
specifically, I reacted with laughter, I didn't know the background to the video, but I am afraid context plays a part.
If it had been me you abused, I would never have forgiven you, if it had been me, I may never had been able to come out myself. I didn't even come to the realization that I was homosexual until senior year of high school, when I was good and ready.
What you have done is worse than harm the body of another, you have harmed the mind, the mental equilibrium, of another, in doing so, you created more of the hordes of unthinking reactionaries homosexuals have to deal with constantly, and in continuing provocation, you only create more. They have become unthinking individuals as a result of a crime committed by you, and this video, regardless of excuse, only serves to reinforce this notion with the further implication of moral ineptitude. I myself cannot conceive of the disregard and sickness predicated by the act you were convicted of. There is a reason they call it 'sick' you know, the term is used when, to think of the mind capable of such acts makes one do just that, to express a lack of remorse towards such an act, authentic or not, is only to create more hatred among those who previously may have been spared from it. You are successfully propagating your own hatred and in doing so, making life harder for people like me, who have been accused of 'kiddy fiddling' or called a 'sick fuck,' for little reason other than being seen holding hands with another of the same sex. Obviously the intelligent will see this distinction, between homosexuality and pedophilia, but it seems obvious to you that there are few of these people, as it does to me, and it does not make the name calling, the embarrassment, or the occasional discrimination any easier, for either of us. In doing this it seems you have done more for the process of discrimination and hate than a KKK member, simply statistically speaking, a KKK member is largely insignificant in public appeal, your message of hate, clouded in an opposite message, is made known through the context of you.
I do believe that pedophilia is a relatively small and benign issue on a global scale, and the atrocities committed in the middle east are far more imperative, but the triage of emergency is not imperative save for the elected, personal corruption should always take precedence over global corruption, otherwise we cannot distinguish personal hatred from moral outrage, a concept that you sir, may well consider taking into consideration.
I believe that is all I have to say on the subject, please, gaz(message) me if you would like, or if you haven't been banned. Without anger, without hatred, understanding is forgiveness and thats all I'm shooting for.
-Adam
(
Arsonade is saving up for a new box of hummus, Mon 12 May 2008, 4:31,
Reply)
Jonathan King springs to mind!
Well, he's had plenty of time in nick to dream up something like that... Brilliant!
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 13:04, Reply)
I
was almost buggered by that naughty man.
Back in 1984/85, JK had a radio show on Capital Radio - when the show finished, he invited listeners to phone in. Being an excitable 14 year old who wanted to be a dj, I did so and he invited me up to the Capital Radio studios in Euston road the following week.
I turned up, eagerly awaiting to meet a REAL celebrity with valid advice and he invited me into his beige Rolls Royce with a predictable personalised number plate (something like JK 69 - or equally as wanky)
Anyway, we drove to Harrods - where he purchased a turkey. Looking back, I reckon he wanted to stuff it up my smooth boy arse. I may be wrong, of course.
Then we parked up and he took out a note pad and started asking me questions. He was the producer of a show called No Limits at the time and said he needed to ask questions for 'the youth angle'.
It started off with: "What's your favourite band?" - "What tv shows do you like?" etc etc. Then, it moved to: "Are you a virgin?" and "What sexual orientation are you?" - Being a 14 year old virgin, I replied "I don't know. Probably on top."
He then started shivering and shaking in a dirty orgasmy way and I asked if I could leave. I could tell he wanted to shove that Harrods turkey up my unique boy hole.
Years' later, when all his antics came to light, I was tempted to stick up for him in court as he didn't actually bugger me to shreds. But then there was something on television and by the time I remembered, several months later, the ganymede-guzzler was being beaten to a bloody pulp in prison.
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 14:54, Reply)
Hmm, why not front page this then?
I mean, it's not as if there's loads of more deserving talent to put in the newsletter. Oh look! JK's on b3ta!
(, Sat 10 May 2008, 17:31, Reply)
I'll say it once, I'll say it again
Having sex with consenting midgets is far less illegal than with children, but if you half close your eyes it's the same. And the bonus is that the cocks are adult sized...
(
Roland E O'Dorant R Tape loading error, 0:1, Sat 10 May 2008, 19:42,
Reply)
.d8888b. 888 888 888b 888 88888888888 888
d88P Y88b 888 888 8888b 888 888 888
888 888 888 888 88888b 888 888 888
888 888 888 888Y88b 888 888 888
888 888 888 888 Y88b888 888 888
888 888 888 888 888 Y88888 888 Y8P
Y88b d88P Y88b. .d88P 888 Y8888 888 "
"Y8888P" "Y88888P" 888 Y888 888 888
(
Captn Hood-Butter is not dead yet., Sun 11 May 2008, 18:17,
Reply)
Just so you know, I always hated your stuff, even before you were a convicted paedophile.
Please take as long as you like before coming back.
(
Smallbrainfield, Mon 12 May 2008, 13:19,
Reply)
What do you know...
Me too.
Talentless fuckwit.
Im fairly sure nobody of any age would ever want to bump uglies with that man.
Probably why he had to prey on the vulnerable to get his kicks.
(, Tue 13 May 2008, 12:48, Reply)
see, even after he spent time inside
at heart he's still a pop genius, it's perhaps even catchier than "Everyone's Gone to the Moon"
(
Pootle, Fri 16 May 2008, 16:02,
Reply)
my name is jacob dyer and i live in bristol. it is fantastic. i sound like barnaby bear. i like barnaby bear. one time he went to france. i went to france. but some kid burnt my neck. i didnt like it.
(
mongychops, Fri 16 May 2008, 16:03,
Reply)
hi
Are you sure that the kid that burnt your neck was in fact Jonathan in disguise?!?
(, Sun 18 May 2008, 20:20, Reply)
nonce
see the manky old spunker has put the video up as he knows it will generate a reaction, desperate to be the center of attention, the shrivelled fucker has turned to shock videos to get some limelight, the reality is he is a dirty old letch sitting at home waiting to see the reaction that he gets on here in some self dellusional 'i'm still popular' ego trip.
anyway you sad little man, you will die alone and be forgotten by all but a few who need a subject for a nonce joke,
why not go out in a blaze of media glory by drinking a gallon of bleach, you'd really get some headlines
(, Mon 19 May 2008, 12:40, Reply)
I didn't even realise you were still alive.
How sad.
(
routine has perfected burgers, Thu 22 May 2008, 23:12,
Reply)
ooh i can still reply to this
...in that case.
(
Spunky McPunk not dead yet, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 14:52,
Reply)
Nice to see this thread is still alive
:)
(
Jacksonville Missed me fuckin Candles, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 18:32,
Reply)