can someone who knows about computers tell me if I should be amazed by this real time rendering?
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:14, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:14, Share, Reply)
Yes and no.
Yes because that sort of render used to take quite a lot of time fairly recently. You would be doing well to do a frame in less than a few minutes only a decade ago.
No because computers and graphics cards are now so fast that it is hard not to do stuff in real time if you buy something expensive and use it :)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:17, Share, Reply)
Yes because that sort of render used to take quite a lot of time fairly recently. You would be doing well to do a frame in less than a few minutes only a decade ago.
No because computers and graphics cards are now so fast that it is hard not to do stuff in real time if you buy something expensive and use it :)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:17, Share, Reply)
Strange - everyone else said it was this:
We're both wrong.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:26, Share, Reply)
yes,
because 15 years ago (edit - sorry, 20, 1994) it would take an hour to calculate this 3d image:
whereas that video is calculating 25 frames a second at that high resolution and complexity of light bouncing/realism
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:24, Share, Reply)
because 15 years ago (edit - sorry, 20, 1994) it would take an hour to calculate this 3d image:
whereas that video is calculating 25 frames a second at that high resolution and complexity of light bouncing/realism
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:24, Share, Reply)
Not that one.
That's just one quad with texture and bump map, a point source, ambient sphere and metallic cylinder. 15 seconds tops.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:58, Share, Reply)
That's just one quad with texture and bump map, a point source, ambient sphere and metallic cylinder. 15 seconds tops.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:58, Share, Reply)
if you bumped up the yadda pixels and incorporated fluff core peogramming, then you could recompexulate the picture in less than 3 seconds.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:01, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:01, Share, Reply)
I understand where you're going with this but can't make out what you're saying as your head is firmly up your arse.
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:10, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:10, Share, Reply)
sorry, I forgot it's 2014, it's 20 years since I made an image like that that took over an hour to render
I think it was an hour and 20 minutes to be precise, in 3d Studio v3
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:18, Share, Reply)
I think it was an hour and 20 minutes to be precise, in 3d Studio v3
( , Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:18, Share, Reply)