Found a problem on B3ta? Want other features that we don't currently offer? Type your ideas here with your finger-mouths. (We don't promise we'll act on any of it, but we will read it and your words could even prompt us into action.)
(, Wed 1 Nov 2006, 11:48)
Tell Us Your Story »
Could you do the same with Australia?
(, Wed 12 Jun 2013, 10:36, 4 replies, latest was 5 hours ago)
You used to be able to sort by popularity, then it got removed, then reinstated, then removed. Fucking sort it out (please) - it's clear from Wilf's number of clicks that people want this function.
(, Tue 11 Jun 2013, 10:42, Reply)
Users should have to click through using tiny buttons hidden at the bottom of the page among a selection of ads for dating and dieting websites.
Some of the ads should look like little navigation buttons.
This is what professional websites look like these days, and b3ta has to keep up or die.
(, Mon 3 Jun 2013, 8:09, 5 replies, latest was 5 days ago)
If a profile gets a large amount of ignores, it should get highlighted to an admin picked up for review (ie if 20-30 profiles suddenly ignore in a week for doing something) and if it's for a genuine reason and is not something that can be reversed (as in can be given a warning) ban it. Should get rid of most of the shit advert profiles as they surface and possibly calm down the trolls for a bit.
I don't know if you do this already, if you do then kudos :)
(, Sat 1 Jun 2013, 10:04, 1 reply, 3 weeks ago)
(, Fri 24 May 2013, 17:58, 2 replies, latest was 3 weeks ago)
I'm sure we'd all rather see pictures of coronation street and posts calling the Emo-spastics mean names.
(, Thu 25 Apr 2013, 12:31, Reply)
so now i look like an illiterate prick
(, Mon 22 Apr 2013, 22:24, 4 replies, latest was 3 weeks ago)
I sent a polite reminder to ban the Miseries but they're all still here.
(, Fri 19 Apr 2013, 22:53, 1 reply, 2 months ago)
Or a cash prize for specific numbered posts...the numbers would be chosen by you, of course. Thanks x
(, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 16:59, 1 reply, 2 months ago)
can you make it so that those users can't edit their posts that formed the content of their deleted thread to make them 'win' the argument with their witty rhetoric, thought up hours after the initial incident?
Alternately, a new button which you can refer a user's spontaneously thought-up 'facts' to an expert panel of internet judges who can give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to the correctness, logic and validity of the wildly inaccurate statements thrown into the path of a semantic argument, meant to bolster a dubious proclamation that was issued in error in the first place?
(, Mon 15 Apr 2013, 22:16, 5 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
(, Sat 13 Apr 2013, 21:26, 5 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
Can we also have a script that replies to every first post in a thread with the following...
"don't be a cock"
"FFS dude get help"
"^this"
(, Thu 11 Apr 2013, 14:23, 2 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
Can every single member be FORCED to have a Facebook account before they can login.
Thanks.
(, Thu 11 Apr 2013, 14:22, 3 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
Is it just me?
... or are they trying to tell me something?
(, Wed 10 Apr 2013, 13:43, Reply)
(, Sat 6 Apr 2013, 11:04, Reply)
(, Thu 4 Apr 2013, 16:15, 2 replies, latest was 3 months ago)
(, Thu 4 Apr 2013, 14:59, Reply)
(, Thu 4 Apr 2013, 12:28, Reply)
I don't follow every page of /board when at work, so end up lurking around Fraser's profile page to see if he's posted a new message... would be easier if Image Challenge Vote's ended up on the front page web log.
Ta!
(, Thu 4 Apr 2013, 5:38, 1 reply, 3 months ago)
And calendar while you're at it, nobody worthwhile goes to bashes anymore.
(, Sun 31 Mar 2013, 15:34, 2 replies, latest was 3 months ago)
There seem to be a number of posters who keep going waaaahhh when they see things they don't like, but appear to be acceptable according to the FAQ.
Perhaps these cretins are too thick to understand this, so adding some more detail (preferably in words of one syllable) might help them grasp that, for example, if a part of the site supports images then posting images is acceptable.
Adding something about 'stop fucking moaning, if you don't like it fuck off' may also help.
(, Sun 31 Mar 2013, 12:19, 2 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
var navbar = document.getElementById("navbar");
if (navbar != null) {
var navAnchors = navbar.getElementsByTagName("a");
if (navAnchors != null) {
var faqAnchor = navAnchors[navAnchors.length -3]
var barText = document.createTextNode(" | ");
var otAnchor = document.createElement("a");
otAnchor.href = "/questions/offtopic/";
otAnchor.innerHTML = "OT";
faqAnchor.parentNode.insertBefore(otAnchor, faqAnchor.nextSibling);
faqAnchor.parentNode.insertBefore(barText, faqAnchor.nextSibling);
}
}ta.
(, Thu 28 Mar 2013, 23:20, 7 replies, latest was 3 months ago)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 17:15, 2 replies, latest was 2 months ago)
so I can fix all my old image links to something more persistent
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 11:54, Reply)
Tell Us Your Story »