Corporate IdiocyComedian Al Murray recounts a run-in with industrial-scale stupidity: "Car insurance company rang, without having sent me a renewal letter, asking for money. Made them answer security questions." In the same vein, tell us your stories about pointless paperwork and corporate quarter-wits
(
Scaryduck LIKES EGG, Thu 23 Feb 2012, 12:13)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
"8.7.1 [If you are sending confidential informaion attach the folowing as a signature]: 'The informaiton contained in this message and any attachments is confidential [...] If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and delete the messageIf it was sent to me then surely I am a named recipient?
Legally it should say something along the lines "if you have received this message in error."
I don't think there's been a legal case where the validity of these terms has been questioned but they're most likely bollocks (but I am not a lawyer and taking legal advice from B3ta would not be a good idea).
(, Sun 26 Feb 2012, 21:17, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread