Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Well done Hippy, good answer.
I have decided to be nice to you as use wishy washy liberal types need to stick together against the Nazi Coalition headed by Fuhrer Boyce.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:47, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
I have decided to be nice to you as use wishy washy liberal types need to stick together against the Nazi Coalition headed by Fuhrer Boyce.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:47, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
I've just had a quick scan through that previous thread.
What a bunch of nasty little right-wingers we have round here.
Come the revolution, Comrade...
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:49, Reply)
What a bunch of nasty little right-wingers we have round here.
Come the revolution, Comrade...
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:49, Reply)
Indeed.
At least it seems we can rely on the support of Quinten, and maybe Gonz. The makes us more awesome, if not more literate.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:52, Reply)
At least it seems we can rely on the support of Quinten, and maybe Gonz. The makes us more awesome, if not more literate.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:52, Reply)
Your boy Quentin is really growing into a fine young man.
He'll make you proud one day.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
He'll make you proud one day.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
They're generally angry bitter people who don't believe that a country has to protect it's citizens.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:53, Reply)
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:53, Reply)
Nothing wrong with protecting the weak and vulnerable.
Dole scum job-avoiding workshy cunts who are perfectly able to get and keep a job are not weak and or vulnerable. They are lazy and should not be supported by the state.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
Dole scum job-avoiding workshy cunts who are perfectly able to get and keep a job are not weak and or vulnerable. They are lazy and should not be supported by the state.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
The whole 'nature versus nuture' debate is much broader than this.
TBH, I can't be arsed to begin discussing that.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:03, Reply)
TBH, I can't be arsed to begin discussing that.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:03, Reply)
Not so
they/we just think that if you are getting something for free that you don't have the right to bitch about where you get it.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)
they/we just think that if you are getting something for free that you don't have the right to bitch about where you get it.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)
I don't want them living near me. They make the place look untidy.
Send them Up North where they can spruce the place up and teach the denizens how to use a knife and fork. An shit indoors.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:05, Reply)
Send them Up North where they can spruce the place up and teach the denizens how to use a knife and fork. An shit indoors.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:05, Reply)
I wouldn't protect any fucker that doesn't know where apostrophes go.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:04, Reply)
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:04, Reply)
urrrrgh
people who don't get apostrophes really annoy me. it's soooooo simple.
abbreviation or possessive? it gets an apostrophe. plural? it doesn't. the only two exceptions you need in every day life are "its" and "it's" and "who's" and "whose". THAT'S IT! THAT REALLY IS IT! THAT'S THE GOLDEN RULE YOU MORON.
when i am queen, i will burn every shop selling "fish and chip's".
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:22, Reply)
people who don't get apostrophes really annoy me. it's soooooo simple.
abbreviation or possessive? it gets an apostrophe. plural? it doesn't. the only two exceptions you need in every day life are "its" and "it's" and "who's" and "whose". THAT'S IT! THAT REALLY IS IT! THAT'S THE GOLDEN RULE YOU MORON.
when i am queen, i will burn every shop selling "fish and chip's".
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:22, Reply)
Can you also destroy all people who mix up "was" and "were" in speech?
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:25, Reply)
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:25, Reply)
either "i sat" or "i was sitting" would be fine
"i was sat" implies someone picked you up and forcibly parked your arse.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
"i was sat" implies someone picked you up and forcibly parked your arse.
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
and no
the fundamental problem is, if you say that, you are a colossal fuckwit
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
the fundamental problem is, if you say that, you are a colossal fuckwit
( , Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread