You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1605143 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 777, 776, 775, 774, 773, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

So, it looks as thoiugh the dead spy in a bag thing is over,
and there was nothing dodgy in the case. Do you believe this? Do you think the government is covering up something? Do you trust the buggers? Are you bothering to vote tomorrow?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:51, Reply)
If it was that dodgy the Government would have issued a 'D notice' at the time of his death to prevent any media reports.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:55, Reply)
Thank you, George Smiley.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:56, Reply)
POLICE OFFICER NO GIVE ME PRODUCER

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:01, Reply)
Just give us what we want - the real sensimania

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:05, Reply)
A mate of mine interviewed him once
at his house in Surrey. Apparently he had a stack of gold bars in his sitting room.

When my pal went to leave, he nearly took out his gatepost, Smiley was concerned but my pal, quick as a flash, said 'don't worry, 'me is an expert dri-varrr'. Many lols were had.

The End.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:09, Reply)
Your mate interviewed John Le Carre's fictional character George Smiley?
Good skills.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:12, Reply)
Nothing dodgy?
He locked himself in that bag? FFS. What a bunch of lying cunts.

I shall be voting tomorrow as should everyone. Voting should be compulsory.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:55, Reply)
I don't think everyone should vote tomorrow
I won't be
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:57, Reply)
Let's have a vote on it!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:03, Reply)
You should have stood as a candidate for election.
Representing the Spacker Mong Cowlick Shandy-drinking Homo Party.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:57, Reply)
The only party you could give your vote to.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:58, Reply)
Calm down, litl'un.
Nobody wants to fight you.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
He's just upset that he can't reach the ballot boxes.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:12, Reply)
Or make his mark with an "X"
*illiteracylols"
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:13, Reply)
Naked Ape votes using his head dobber.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:19, Reply)
I will not be voting tomorrow!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:56, Reply)
I couldn't care less.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Government covered up many things, but the majority of conspiracy theorists are quite clearly retarded.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:57, Reply)
It depends what you class as a "conspiracy theorist",
someone who doesn't trust the buggers as far as they can spit, doesn't sound that mad to me.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:04, Reply)
I mean people that believe David Icke speaks sense
Sensing something a bit fishy is one thing, going all out to claim it's a 'conspiracy' and that people should 'wake up' to it are two ways that instantly make me think you're mentally lacking.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
I've got no person to vote for.
Elections in Luton are determined by spitting competions.

Of course the government are covering up something. I don't know what is though, as they are doing a splendid job.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 10:59, Reply)
Are you being asked to vote on whether you want a mayor?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:16, Reply)
No. Nothing at all.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
Winners don't vote

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:01, Reply)
The bloke was a tranny chutney with form for bondage.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:02, Reply)
I wondered where Darth had gone.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:05, Reply)
Hahahah

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:07, Reply)
There was a dead spy in the case.
That's fairly dodgy.
We don't have elections tomorrow, so I will probably not vote. I may go and stand outside the usual polling office and ask people who they will vote for, though. That could be fun for five minutes.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:03, Reply)
A spy of such high importance, it took them 7 days to realise he hadn't come into work.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:06, Reply)
Civil servants for you.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:14, Reply)
publicsectorslackingpiss!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:18, Reply)
top spy maybe
but he was still civil service.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:16, Reply)
Well, no. Not at all.
The pathologist has said she cannot consider an unlawful killing verdict. Because there's not a shred of evidence showing that.

Doesn't mean nothing dodgy happened. Just means the job of a coroner is not to wildly speculate. Unlike the fucktards in the press. Or that twat of a fucking lawyer the bloke's family are using. "killed by someone praciced in the dark arts?" this isn't harry cunting potter. The bloke should be disbarred for being a sensationalist moron.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:03, Reply)
THATS WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:04, Reply)
no, it's not.
It's the press, yet again, not having the faintest fucking idea how these things work but writing SENSATIONAL EXCLUSIVE SHIT AGAIN.

Cunts should be thrown in bear bit.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:22, Reply)
AH! BUT THATS WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:56, Reply)
What are your thoughts on this?
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/01/open-free-access-academic-research
If you get past the political posturing, it's a solid idea that should have happened years ago.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:17, Reply)
It's a good idea
But the problem is the highest-rated journals are not open access. RCUK have put in a rule now that any funding they pay for (which is a large amount of UK scientific reseach) must be published in open access journals by next year I think. But things like Nature aren't open access, and the quality of the journal you publish in affects firstly my career and secondly how much money my uni gets for me from other sources.

It needs to happen but it's cart before horse right now. The top journals have to be forced to be open access somehow.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:21, Reply)
Isn't the ultimate point of research, usually, to monetise it at a later date?
Doesn't sharing the research then make this more difficult to be first?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:24, Reply)
no, not really.
That's the ultimate point of most of my research, which gets me in trouble becuase I don't publish a lot of the stuff I do, I patent it instead. But a lot of academics just do blue sky stuff for "the knowledge expansion" so they just publish all the time, if it has no commerical worth.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:27, Reply)
Fair enough.
Whilst noble and raising us further away from the rest of God's creation, I would prefer to see the taxpayer turning a profit on state funded research. There's a recession on you know.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:30, Reply)
Take his pension, Stunned!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:32, Reply)
I think you'll find that's my area of expertise.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:37, Reply)
You always do see a profit.
It attracts inward investment and strengthens the economy, plus high reseach impact attracts overseas students and academics who also contribute financially. Only a fucking idiot reduces scientific research funding in a recession. Or Osborne. Oh, no, wait, I covered him the first time.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)
That article said govt investment on research had been protected for the life of the Parliamant?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:38, Reply)
The article was written by David Willets.
He's a Tory politician.

It hasn't. Believe me, it hasn't.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:00, Reply)
for journals (or magazines) like Nature
are you allowed to publish a longer form follow-up paper elsewhere? I thought this was the case with letter journals.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:28, Reply)
Possibly, it would rather depend
but that's not really the point. It's not just Nature. Anything with an impact rating worth bothering with currently isn't open access.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:30, Reply)
Yes, indeed
I think researchers could make their work very accessible to the public while still publishing in high impact journals. Unfortunately it would require a lot of extra work and wouldn't really do anything for their h-index or future job prospects so there is a lack of incentive there.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:42, Reply)
It's nothing to do with your second sentence
You can't publish in more than one place because it breaches copyright and breaches several scientific ethics codes.

And most of us deliberately keep our stuff out of the mainstream press when we can becuase idiot journalists/press offices misrepresent what we say.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:02, Reply)
I was amused by the guy whose job was to try to lock himself into a bag and climb into a bath
Just to see if it was possible.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:04, Reply)
Monty got a tenner for that.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:05, Reply)
The BBC say they used "Bag Experts" for that
I'm thinking of changing career, does anyone know what kind of qualification one needs to become a bag expert?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:06, Reply)
A Satchelor of Arts?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:08, Reply)
Nice.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:09, Reply)
It's a click from me.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
DING DING DING
We Have A Winnar!
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
Oh well played.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:12, Reply)
You need a BA to start with.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:08, Reply)
Hahahah

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
That was funny.
He'd been practising for months.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:08, Reply)
'bag experts' lol

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:18, Reply)
For some reason I'm registered for a postal vote even though I never remember asking for one
so I voted last week. A couple of dozen times I expect.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
I got a letter from that bent cunt Johnson asking me to register for a postal vote.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:28, Reply)
meh. on the one hand, that bent Tory cunt Johnson
on the other, slimy wifebeating serial liar and trot cunt Livingston.

I'm amazed anyone in London can degrade themselves enough to vote for either, really.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:32, Reply)
Boris for king of England!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:34, Reply)
With Wiff Waff as the national sport.
I will be voting for the trot cunt.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
The sole redeeming feature people seem to find in Boris, poltically I mean
is that he "isn't really as much of a buffoon as he appears"

Only given the current witless state of fucking humanity could that be considered an actual reason to give someone control of London. It's like appointing a childminder on the ground that "they haven't actually raped as many children as it looks like"
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
And the really scary thing is that he is actually that much of a buffoon
it's just since he got into office he has refused to discuss anything he does other than at carefully arranged press releases. He never takes questions or engages in debate, because when he does, he comes across as a witless tosser.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:41, Reply)
And yet, if you held a gun to my wife's head and actually forced me to make decision
I'd still probably take him. He's a twat, and Tory twat at that.

But Livingston is actually a genuinely nasty piece of work.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:46, Reply)
He may be, but so is Boris. Which is why the whole mayoral system is pretty fucking ridiculous as it's coming down to personality over what they are actually doing.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:49, Reply)
Neither of them are in any way suitable to run a global economic centre.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:57, Reply)
Yeah but isn't this true of all politics
I know you're supposed to vote for the party and for the ideals and manifesto etc, but look at what happened when Gordon Brown became the leader of the Labour party.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:34, Reply)
Boris is great.
1) wiff waff speech
2) getting rid of tube drivers
3) wrote a great book on Ancient Rome

VOTE WINNERS, ALL.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
This is the problem when you try and do it on personality
but given that Johnson's record is of massive overspends on every project he's been involved in and no new ideas during his term, voting for Ken at least puts someone with ideas in office.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:38, Reply)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaaa
*dies fucking laughing*

Ahem, overspends? GLC in the eighties? yeah. Ken's solid fucking economic gold, mate.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:41, Reply)
Goldie Lookin' Chain?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:41, Reply)
Monty's mothers got a penis

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:43, Reply)
Greater London Council.
How London used to be run before it collapesed in massive overspend, very obvious fraud and Livingston and others being incredibly lucky to avoid arrest and prosecution
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:45, Reply)
allegedly.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:54, Reply)
The two achievements he talks about are the bikes and the new routemaster.
Both were massively more expensive than claimed, and with the buses, they were a fucking pointless vanity project instead of just improving an existing bus design.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:42, Reply)
not arguing for a single second with you on that.
The idea that a man who masterminded the epic financial fraud/clusterfuck that was the GLC would be better, however, is the best bit of comedy I've heard in AGES. Thanks ;)
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:44, Reply)
But he was better. His record in office is better than Boris'.
Under Boris fares have actually risen above inflation, under Kens they stayed about the same as inflation.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:47, Reply)
That has absolutely cock all to do with mayoral policy I suspect
and everything to do with the state of the economy and investment in projects.

I'm not defending Boris. I just think it's funny that anyone can defend Ken on economic or financial management grounds
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:53, Reply)
You might just as well argue
that while Boris overspends, at least he hasn't been repeatedly and very obviously guilty of massive levels of fraud and cover-ups.

I don't really care about personality. They are both very obviously fucking awful and shouldn't be in charge of a lemonade stall let alone the capital.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:43, Reply)
Which fraud and cover ups?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:45, Reply)
He's been tarred with several throughout his career
The Jasper stuff, coupld of overseas deals when he was mayor, plus all the money GLC lost.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:52, Reply)
I'm voting to have your account deleted and for you to be killed, soz
He seems to have been a dirty bummer who liked being suffocated, I bet someone locked him in and then was too busy exploring Darths innards with their cock that they forgot about him.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:10, Reply)
Dirty bummers are people too.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:18, Reply)
Only just.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:18, Reply)
I wish people would be nicer to the gayers.
They do seem to cop a lot more shit than the rest of us.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:23, Reply)
That's because they put their pee-pees in each other's bum-bums.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:26, Reply)
dirty boys.
oh, and as you're probably aware, TTJ.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:28, Reply)
TTJ?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
That's The Joke

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
Thanks.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:39, Reply)
Rejected early draft for the sermon on the mount.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:26, Reply)
is cop some english colloquialism for 'stab' that i'm not aware of?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:26, Reply)
b3th is not English

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:29, Reply)
wtf/ where's she from the dirty foreign cunt?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:30, Reply)
Wa-Les.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:32, Reply)
i genuinely hate the welsh
their accent is stupid, their language is shit, as far as i can see they're not a country and they have never contributed anything to the world, ever

except imogen thomas, thanks for that guys
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:34, Reply)
I like the accent, I like the language
but every Welshman I have ever met has been a racist, chip-shouldered prick.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)
the welsh accent is like brummie or west country
as soon as i hear it i assume the person i am talking to is EXTREMELY stupid

the language is just english with a shitload of unnecessary consonants shat all over the place like pricks. 'ambilaans'? pricks
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
They don't have a lot of modern words in their language.
So they've used ours modified for their phonetics. Ambwlans. Am-boo-lans
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:38, Reply)
its a shit prick language
have you ever tried writing to someone in wales? you start typing the address and you're like

1 gocviawvavv,
klwicvovlawero
qwohvnsebep
cymru
PR1 CK5
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:39, Reply)
Hedlu
Hahahahahahaha.

Silly sheepshaggers.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
Heddlu means "peace force"
Trufax
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:44, Reply)
utter pricks

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:45, Reply)
How very dare you!
I'm a porridge wog, thank you very much.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
a scot? i like the scots

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
oh good.
i feel completely validated.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:44, Reply)
Typical miserable sweaty sock.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:48, Reply)
I'm like Kenny Dalgleish.
Exactly the same facial expression for a 1-0 defeat as for a 3-0 victory.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:52, Reply)
Muttering inintelligible sexual threats?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:53, Reply)
I always prefer the inintelligible threats

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:54, Reply)
Oops. Unintelligible.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:02, Reply)
inintelligable could be like inflammable
as in extremely unintelligible
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:04, Reply)
Well if they're going to stick their willy up another blokes bot-bot, that's bound to happen.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:27, Reply)
Because they are deviants WHO CONDUCT UNNATURAL ACTS ON OTHER SODOMITES.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:30, Reply)
It's against GOD'S LAW!!!!!!!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:32, Reply)
THEY WILL BE SMITED.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
SMOTE

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)
i fucken love the gays
unless they're really camp and queenie, that can fuck off
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)
Battered, the Scrappy-Do of /OT
This makes Monty Shaggy and Stunned Scoobs.

I'm totally Fred.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
i'm the bird with the red hair

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)

Fred Velma
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
No, Al's Velma, the fat fuck.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
can i be daphne?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:46, Reply)
Don't see why not.
You'll have to shag Fred.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:53, Reply)
i always assumed
scooby doo was kind of VERY loosely based on the famous five?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:54, Reply)
Timmy!

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:56, Reply)
I never thought of that.
You'll be telling me that Top Cat was based on The Phil Silvers Show.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:01, Reply)
And Dangermouse was based on The Open University Physics syllabus.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:04, Reply)
i don't know
i haven't bothered expounding the theory, not even on google. but you know, 2 guys, 2 girls, 1 dog, solving mysteries...
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:05, Reply)
What's the difference between a fox and a dog?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:16, Reply)
2 pints

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:17, Reply)
Haha. Baddumtish.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:20, Reply)

Fred Scooby
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:55, Reply)
Fred couldn't be more obviously gay
if he had a flat leather cap, chaps and a moustache.

Daphne's his beard because her father abused her in childhood so she can't bring herself to have a sexual relationship with anyone but loves the attention

Velma goes like a belt sander.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:06, Reply)
you've put a lot of thought into this, haven't you darling?
a bit TOO much, if you know what i mean.

also, what did shaggy do wrong?!
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:07, Reply)
he's too stoned to get it up.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:07, Reply)
the film was on channel 5 on sunday
Velma was 60000% more attractvie than sarah michelle gellar
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:07, Reply)
Oh fucking hell.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:40, Reply)
You love those pesky kids.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:44, Reply)
as date for pizza is now looking like tue 29
can you come to that, you unutterable slagfest?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:47, Reply)
I am free on the 29th May.
I will take the matter under advisement.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:51, Reply)
excellent
battered?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:54, Reply)
I cannot do the 29th soz

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:56, Reply)
I have consulted the private secretary responsible for my diary. I am available.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:57, Reply)
marvellous! i will confirm with the monty

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:06, Reply)
Not in the way that you do, you freakishly tall nonce.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:50, Reply)
They adore a McLovin' Meal.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:52, Reply)
"Hehehehehehe"
Rerro Chaggy?
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:42, Reply)
talk postyed something about the FHM top 100
and i looked it up, i don't read that magazine, never have and i've never paid any attnetion to lists of 'yeah i'd fuck that, in this order'

but looking at their list, what the fuck is wrong with them? Tulisa? Jessie J? Miley Fucking Cyrus?
get to fuck
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:56, Reply)
Where was Bettany Hughes?

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:57, Reply)
didn't even rank
these people SICKEN me
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:57, Reply)
I know.
Some of the most vacuous wastes of blood and organs to grace the planet.

Miley Cyrus would get it though.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:58, Reply)
shut up its a child with goofy teeth

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:02, Reply)
Nah, she's good looking.
So HEALTHY.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:04, Reply)
i'm putting you on ignore

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:04, Reply)
Isn't Miley Cyrus getting a bit old now for /talk? She must be legal now.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:59, Reply)
I dislike "lifestyle" magazines on principle,
They're for twatwits without the capacity for independent thought, and far too much cash to waste.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:00, Reply)
Jessie J is not sexy.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:00, Reply)
I disagree
but I dont know why she is
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:02, Reply)
She's a munter. Fact.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:03, Reply)
It's all about the munty, munty, munty

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:05, Reply)
i wish you'd stop being wrong, it upsets me
jessie j is a skinny man with a plasticene nose and a mystic meg wig

fuck off jessie j
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:03, Reply)
haha!
Good description
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:05, Reply)
I'd bang Tulisa too.
As long as she didn't speak.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:06, Reply)
it looks horrible, i wouldn't touch it with yours

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:06, Reply)
I can see the attraction of Tulisa
not my bag, but she is hot.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:07, Reply)
and cher fucking lloyd
thats a child in a tracksuit, FHM you fucking perverts
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:08, Reply)
If you like Croydon chic, maybe.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:10, Reply)
Elocution lessons are easily bought.
Rosie Jones at number 4 gets a thumbs up from me. I respect the vote a bit more.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:14, Reply)
Thumbs, fingers, leg.
You'd get it all up there.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:20, Reply)
G.R.I.M.
There really is something quite wrong with you.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:08, Reply)
No there isn't, so would I.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:14, Reply)
I rest my case.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:16, Reply)
I have excellent taste in women.

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:17, Reply)
Don't get a blowjob though

(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:10, Reply)
All teeth, mate.
Ouch! I said SUCK it, not chew it off.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:19, Reply)
She only lobs one tit out on it too
Fucking amateur
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:28, Reply)
i like a little bit of teeth actually
not too much mind
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:32, Reply)
Already voted via post.
Four more years etc.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 12:38, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 777, 776, 775, 774, 773, ... 1