b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Kids say the shittiest things » Post 1975781 | Search
This is a question Kids say the shittiest things

Smudge the Demon asks: Have your kids - or anyone else's - come out with something that provoked extreme laughter, embarrassment, fear or outrage? Tell us your little darlings' memorable sayings. It's like Take a Break's letters page, only with more swearing

(, Thu 23 May 2013, 15:28)
Pages: Popular, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Oh right, do people not point out obvious white-knighting on /qotw anymore?
I thought they did.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 16:42, 2 replies)
The only time you've seen a white knight is stuffed up some poor ugly bird's clunge.

(, Tue 28 May 2013, 16:49, closed)
Ah, the old white knight accusation.
See, I'm only having this conversation with you because you jumped on me when I was replying to Pooflake. That's why I asked you if you were closing ranks with him.

The problem here is, whilst Pooflake's not terribly amusing and seems rather more angry than is necessary, he's not actually done anything questionable. Whereas you've got a website on which you pay girls to shove toys up their bits so you can take photos of them. Having you stick up for him is doing Pooflake more harm than good.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 16:54, closed)
The problem here is I've never paid anyone to shove anything up anywhere
The whole "emvee pays girls to shove toys up their bits" never happened except in the imaginations of some of this site's least clever contributors. That you're even bringing it up at all speaks volumes about you.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:15, closed)
Oh, sorry. I didn't mean to make false assertions.
It does have to do with girls posing with toys and so on, though? I take it that the toys remain external, then. Is it still a sexual fetish site, or are they posing with Optimus for artistic reasons? In their pants or without?

I'm just asking for clarification here, you understand. I certainly wouldn't want to be inaccurate about the degree of depravity.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:25, closed)

Not a white knight, then - more of a moral crusader.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:34, closed)
there speaks someone who hasn't met him
hitler had more morals than this guy. HITLER.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:35, closed)
Nonsense. I'm more virtuous than Mary Whitehouse.

(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:38, closed)

virtuous dried up and depraved
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:40, closed)
It's not so much a fetish site, more like glamour for geeks
And the models direct the shoots, so the content varies - sometimes they want a Transformers-themed shoot, sometimes it's Star Wars, Mario, Spider-Man - pretty much anything sci-fi, games or comics-related. These days we do a lot more cosplay stuff, since that's popular right now. Oh, and the level of nudity is entirely at the model's discretion - about half our shoots have been (just about) safe for work.

I appreciate that to some of the shutins on here who've never so much as seen a real woman, that must seem like "depravity".
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 17:58, closed)
it's not depraved,
it's just supremely creepy. hth.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 18:17, closed)
Thanks
Next time I need an opinion from an emotionally crippled fatty I'll be sure to ask you
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 19:45, closed)
oh wow, what a zinger.
off you pop then, those playpeople won't insert themselves.
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 19:51, closed)
oh wow, what a zinger
it must have taken ages for Rory to think that one up
(, Tue 28 May 2013, 20:03, closed)
what on earth are you on about now?

(, Tue 28 May 2013, 20:05, closed)
Just observing that you don't appear to have an original thought in your head

(, Wed 29 May 2013, 9:49, closed)
riiiiight.

(, Wed 29 May 2013, 10:34, closed)
Or any thoughts
for that matter
(, Wed 29 May 2013, 10:56, closed)
oh, good one!!

(, Wed 29 May 2013, 12:00, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Popular, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1