particularly when they make no effort to even suggest the true facts, such as:
Amount the News of the Screws claim she is getting a week - £13,901
Amount she ACTUALLY gets a week to support seven kids - £333.
slight discrepancy, no?
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 11:51, archived)
and about 15k a year to support seven kids, with no other income?
The huge amount is simply to cover the rent on a property that needed to be given to them, for some reason in that posh area.
Bit daft innit.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 11:55, archived)
Isn;t that what I just said? or at least meant, anyway. the housing benefit is fundamentally irrelevant. She doesn't see that money, and it's not her fault councils are hideously mismanaged and just blindly pay a stupid amount of rent.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 11:57, archived)
like nice furniture that a furnished rented house of that kind is bound to have, as if that helps her survive somehow. "We have no money for food... oh well, at least we have these SILK CUSHIONS".
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:09, archived)
You should hear the people I work with. They're fuckwits, and frankly this sort of article explains it. They only read this sort of dribble and seem unwilling to actually use their brain.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:14, archived)
but surrond it with irrelevant heresay and speculation and OMG outrage.
I mean, the article does actually admit they only get £330 a week (as long as you can do basic maths anyway, which probably rules out most readers) and after going ON and ON about the expensive telly and the furniture, then actually admits it was all there when they moved in. i mean, seriously, why fucking bother? I'm going to go batshit with a chainsaw in their publication offices. And then describe it as a hedgetrimming episode
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:22, archived)
Or messier. depends on how well it goes..
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:26, archived)
I think it should be the new "postal".
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:29, archived)
but it's still shock and outrage that they have it. How dare they even have a telly at all, even a second-hand one!
Mind you, those things use a lot of electricity.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:24, archived)
With CUT FLOWERS!
Holy shit, they should have piles of B&H and Stella cans!
...but how can they afford even THAT!?
rabble rabble rabble red-top newspaper daily mail rabble rabble!
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:15, archived)
The majority of the comments come from people who've never thought to brighten up their house with flowers, or abhor the thought.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:21, archived)
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:22, archived)
pizza boxes and empty stella cans, how are we ever to know they are on benefits?
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:24, archived)
if they're not wallowing in self pity. Poor people should be miserable, damn it! It's the natural order.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:26, archived)
or make the best of what she's got at the moment.
It doesn't mention that they don't actually spend the money on cheap fags, booze, sitting in the pub all night, a car, holidays, or anything like that.
They may have a huge house, but in cash terms they've got diddly zip, none of it is theirs.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:25, archived)
How dare she complain she can't afford things she can't afford, even though she's been given an implausibly large house she didn't specifically ask for.
(, Mon 13 Oct 2008, 12:28, archived)