You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 7524618 (Thread)

help me out here,
am I really the mental one in this exchange?
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:18, archived)
Without reading it,
I'm going to go with yes.
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:19, archived)
ha

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:19, archived)
have you read ' genealogy of morals' ?

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:23, archived)
as in this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Genealogy_of_Morality ?

I have not.
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:26, archived)
you'd enjoy it i think, morality is unstable at best , more likely fiction imho, the intelligent are underminded by morality

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:29, archived)
I might,
I've never read any Nietzsche. I kind of gathered he was a madman.
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:31, archived)
Aye, syphilis will tend to do that.

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:56, archived)
even at the end his writings were a incredible insight in to a view of the human mind that had never been explored unlike your mum

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:59, archived)
mumlolz!

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 19:19, archived)
neither of you are right, it isn't a thing you can be right about

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:49, archived)
no, you're not
you're arguing with the sort of gobshite who refuses to believe that humans are responsible for their own actions.
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:51, archived)
it is all so hypocritical, you could mention glass houses, but that would still have the assumption of a common morality

(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 18:54, archived)
Absolutely.
And that's without even looking at it.
(, Sun 1 Jul 2012, 19:21, archived)