Making it smaller is always the best thing(file size is smaller for dial-upers).
The 'width thing' is just changing from this:
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" />
to
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" width=xxx />
EDIT: Okay, it's not in the URL (that was misleading) it's in the link/anchor.
(The 'width thing' is just changing from this:
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" />
to
<img src="http://foo.com/bar.jpg" width=xxx />
EDIT: Okay, it's not in the URL (that was misleading) it's in the link/anchor.
Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:14,
archived)
NahThat just made it unreadable. I'll stick with just making the original image smaller and posting that instead, like what I already done.
Next time I'll make sure the image I make is a more useable size!
(Next time I'll make sure the image I make is a more useable size!
Afinkawan Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:19,
archived)
Oh doing what you did was the better option ...Using "width=" is just a quick hack :)
( Hagbard ... it's been a long time.,
Fri 5 Mar 2004, 17:29,
archived)