b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Creationism » Message 7294945

[challenge entry] Evolution of Broam

From the Creationism challenge. See all 279 entries (closed)

(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:53, archived)
# BAHAHAHA
Broam!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:53, archived)
# aha!
irreduceable complexity
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:54, archived)
# Weirdly,
I think this is the most eloquent argument for Creationism I've ever seen.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:54, archived)
# I think the
main thing they pounce on is the idea that some bits of nature are really, really complex

Their logic is as follows

I, personally, cannot comprehend how something this complex can have evolved
Therefore
It didn't evolve
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:58, archived)
# Ah yes...
Had someone at my door once telling me that the eye couldn't possibly have evolved...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:59, archived)
# even tho it's lots of little eyes
with a protective layer on it

:D
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:02, archived)
# Yes indeed. That is one of their main arguments.

However, there are examples of all the stages of the evolution of the eye to be found throughout the animal kingdom, from light-sensitive cells directly on the nervous system, to great big googly eyes that follow you around the room.

In addition, if the eye is supposed to be an example of intelligent design, then the designer is a fucking idiot. The eye is actually one of the most poorly 'designed' features of the human body, especially with it being our primary sense.
The photo-sensitive cells are behind the axons, meaning most of the light is lost there.
The nerves all go across those cells and out the back, leaving the blind spot. A fucking blind spot, mind. In the bloody eye!
Then there's the problems of corneas and whatnot, misshapen eyes producing myopia and all sorts.
Cataracts.

God's an arsehole then.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:05, archived)
# "right then let's see...
... I'll put that bit in there, and then.. hmmm.. put one of them in the middle of it, and, oh! A magnifying glass, I'll stick that on the front"

I HAVE CREATED THE EYE!

Over-enthusiatic and didn't check the schematic before starting work.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:11, archived)
# I shall respond in the style of a creationist

But you're using too many words. Surely your argument doesn't need so many words. By using so many words, your argument has become invalid. You use too many words. There are too many words.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:11, archived)
# Erk!
Well: eye no good, God idiot.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:12, archived)
# You are using too few words!
Your argument is invalid! Words too few. Few new words!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:16, archived)
# Difftast smarken spladoint,
eret noGod, forstist eyemein inbeingevolved.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:18, archived)
# Hahahaha
Brilliant!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:54, archived)
# hahaha
it makes perfect sense.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:56, archived)
# *broams*
aceness
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:59, archived)
# One of those looks familiar.


Hmmm.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:00, archived)
# ace
tell it to philip pullman
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:01, archived)
# BROAMS FTW
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 17:06, archived)