Retro enough?
From the Make Sci-Fi Retro challenge. See all 593 entries (closed)
( , Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:20, archived)
From the Make Sci-Fi Retro challenge. See all 593 entries (closed)
( , Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:20, archived)
very woo :)
i'm bit confused by the compo though, we're supposed to show the future in the past? or the now in the future? or the past in the future? i've read it twice now and it sounds eerily like the put robots in the past compo, can someone help me please?
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:25,
archived)
It does seem like "robots of history" to me.
The sample pic of a cyberman in a world war photo lends some credence to that. Of course the winners will be the ones that are struck by an inspiron (the particle of inspiration, not the dell notebook) and create something outside the box.
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:28,
archived)
outside of the box is all well and good
but i'd like to know what's inside the box first! no dead / alive cat jokes
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:34,
archived)
Science fiction. 'sci-fi'
So real space missions or current era space is not to be used.
And Starwars wouldn't count this round by a strict ruling.
As it says future fiction. I'm going to repost my Ben-Dur, AGAIN, LOL.
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:31,
archived)
And Starwars wouldn't count this round by a strict ruling.
As it says future fiction. I'm going to repost my Ben-Dur, AGAIN, LOL.
Intro to starwars says 'long ago', so it is the past.
So by that token one could also use current era space
with starwars. Which may only serve to confuse you more.
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:37,
archived)
with starwars. Which may only serve to confuse you more.
He cannot be a benny bender if he is attempting intercourse with a lady
shirley?
( ,
Thu 25 Sep 2008, 7:39,
archived)