![Challenge Entry: The Funny Side of War [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

this image is old as fuck
From the The Funny Side of War challenge. See all 423 entries (closed)
( , Thu 8 Jan 2009, 19:03, archived)

How are you?
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 19:07,
archived)

you still got your Anne Frank picture for reposting in the Jew thread down there?
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 19:08,
archived)

ahahahahahahaAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
*saved and bookmarked and spread everywhere*
*oh and clicked as well*
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 19:33,
archived)
*saved and bookmarked and spread everywhere*
*oh and clicked as well*

I've just clicked to ignore Clut and I feel eminently sensible now.
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:15,
archived)

Clut's failure to understand that an emotional response to a given situation or abstract concept is relative to the person experiencing said response and that objects, ideas and situations do not possess an inherent level of "funniness" or, for that matter, "offensiveness" and that both of those things exist only in ones head, making everything in the universe potentially funny and offensive at the same time. Whether to be offended by something is, ultimately, a choice and Clut has chosen to be offended, while the rest of us have chosen to be amused. It is my considered opinion that this choice reveals Clut to be, what we mental health professionals call, a knob head.
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:18,
archived)

but I'm sure I agree with the rest of your words too.
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:26,
archived)

Like all Daily Mail readers, he actively looks for something to be offended by.
( ,
Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:27,
archived)