b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The Funny Side of War » Message 9077847

[challenge entry] Well I thought this was pretty funny when I first heard about it:

From the The Funny Side of War challenge. See all 422 entries (closed)

(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:33, archived)
# Trousers Begone!!



(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:35, archived)
# Could be done in a Cillit Bang stylee, eh?
;)
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:36, archived)
# That too.


(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:37, archived)
# !
Hysterical! :)
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# Do you think that's what happened to Brighton and Hove then?

It makes sense.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:36, archived)
# It was an Ectasy bomb,
with a side order of Poppers... ;)
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:43, archived)
# 1994?!
that sounds more like nineteen fucking fifty four!

but I love the picture
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:38, archived)
# The technology wasn't ready then
But by 1994 they had it working. What else could possibly explain Queer Eye for the Straight Guy? That much gay couldn't possibly occur in 5 people naturally. It would need some sort of chemical enhancement.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:44, archived)
# I think thats called a video camera, a prduction team and a script.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# Still
Gay in those kinds of concentrated quantities requres chemical stimulation of some sort.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:50, archived)
# Ahhaaaa
That article is fucked
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:40, archived)
# In all fairness
this is a list of things that someone in the Pentagon said "why don't we try...." rather than things that they actually devoted significant time and money to seriously thinking about.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:47, archived)
# 7 million dollars isn't significant?
:s
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:03, archived)
# Re-read it
It said that a plan, that had it been enacted would have cost 7 million, was suggested but not pursued.

But no, in terms of defence expenditure, 7 million is not significant. A preliminary report undertaken to estalish whether it is worth bothering to look into it further probably costs that.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:11, archived)
# Do you think they had any particular drug in mind?
I honestly have seen Ecstacy have similar effects, I have a number of stories but the most relevant was a bunch of my mates in York at a rave that was gatecrashed by a load of squaddies who spent the night picking fights n generally being dicks till they discovered E (the REAL old fashioned MDMA type), then spent the rest of the night dancing, sweating, hugging and snogging and swore they would leave the Army as soon as possible! Seriously!

I don't think they actually shagged tho, LOL!
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:22, archived)
# I know, I was having some funs.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:25, archived)
# so how much gay did you enjoy looking through until you found the right images?
:D
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:47, archived)
# not enough
there's never enough.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:53, archived)
# Y'know, in all seriousness, magazine style skin pics or bog standard shagging porn pretty much is dead to me these days,
too much internet exposure I think.

Plus what goes on in my own time is WAY more interesting... ;)
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:10, archived)
# Excuse me kind sir, but i could'nt help overhearing your prediciment
I have recently been informed your certain disposition, and would like to escort your fine self to a public house specificly designed for homosexuals
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:49, archived)
# i wish those nitwits would develop a straight bomb.
we could use it on the closet-cases who inevitably run for public office and wind up getting caught sucking cock in airport toilets.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 20:53, archived)
# Now that's unfair
I only did that the once.
(, Thu 8 Jan 2009, 21:00, archived)