This again?
No: it means that commercial use of certain images may come under copyright law. And, at a guess, even that would only cover instances in which you were taking a photo of the thing in question for that specific purpose: if it happened to be in the frame, then there'd be no problem. And it's a very small part of a report.
All it does is suggest an amendment to European law that's more or less comparable with what goes on in French law already. Is France imprisoning photographers? No. And there's no reason to suppose that the amendment will be accepted anyway, or that it'd make the blindest bit of difference to the law in any EU country.
Panic over.
(
Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Tue 23 Jun 2015, 20:44,
Share,
Reply)