Balls. The Guardian has a history of managing to make
Readers feel guilty about absolutely everything. Even about being charitable. This is the best of the genre: taking the biggest outpouring of mass-philanthropy the world has ever seen, and spitting unadulterated venom at it: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/11/band-aid-30-patronising-bob-geldof-ebola-do-they-know-its-christmas
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 10:00, Share, Reply)
Readers feel guilty about absolutely everything. Even about being charitable. This is the best of the genre: taking the biggest outpouring of mass-philanthropy the world has ever seen, and spitting unadulterated venom at it: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/11/band-aid-30-patronising-bob-geldof-ebola-do-they-know-its-christmas
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 10:00, Share, Reply)
I am a cardian reading gaurdigan wearing type
and agree wholeheartedly with this.
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 10:17, Share, Reply)
and agree wholeheartedly with this.
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 10:17, Share, Reply)
Did you read the article?
It is no way whatsoever critical of 'readers' or people who donate. It is critical of the modus operandi of the fundraisers.
I didn't bother to read your link since, despite the fact you did bother to find it and copy and paste it, you didn't bother to remove the fucking S after http in order to make it a clickable link. This makes you worse than Hitler. I bid you good day.
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 13:32, Share, Reply)
It is no way whatsoever critical of 'readers' or people who donate. It is critical of the modus operandi of the fundraisers.
I didn't bother to read your link since, despite the fact you did bother to find it and copy and paste it, you didn't bother to remove the fucking S after http in order to make it a clickable link. This makes you worse than Hitler. I bid you good day.
( , Sat 25 Mar 2017, 13:32, Share, Reply)