b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1430886 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post Obviously they aren't going to expect the kids to dress up in a suit.
But for fucks sake, When you read that business/formal wear is a requirement, only a thick twat would think "Oh, I'll just dress the kids up in any old shite then."
I'm sure the leggings would have been perfectly fine if they were being accompanied with shorts or a skirt, like they're traditionally worn. The fact that popular culture has spawned this awful trend of wearing leggings as outerwear should not play in their defense.

Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 14:00, , Reply)
This is a normal post
Leggings? Cool.


(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 14:13, , Reply)
This is a normal post Boke.

(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 14:35, , Reply)
This is a normal post L@@k at my fanny!!!

(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 16:30, , Reply)
This is a normal post dont mind if i do...
luvly
(, Wed 29 Mar 2017, 11:28, , Reply)
This is a normal post Well, I wonder how that decision is working out for them right now.
1) What IS the point? Most people who've heard about this think it's pointless, so they haven't really made themselves look good.

2) Who benefits?
Is anyone, on seeing a child dressed in casual attire, going to think "wow, United Airlines HR policy has really gone downhill!" ? Of course not.
Is anyone, on hearing a child has been disallowed from boarding (in clothes that would be considered fine for anyone else) going to think "wow, Unite Airlines are unreasonable cunts!" ? Of course they will.

3) They've just wasted a number of usable seats, and they now have to find space on later flights for these children to travel, so they've cost themselves money.
(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 16:10, , Reply)
This is a normal post It's the kind of situation where the company ends up
Saying "fuck the lot of you then, this perk is cancelled as it's too much trouble and everyone takes it for granted".
(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 19:43, , Reply)
This is a normal post Probably.
My guess is that whoever thought up the policy didn't particularly have children in mind. They could just train their staff with slightly better guidelines.
(, Mon 27 Mar 2017, 21:02, , Reply)