No, I have a good source.
It seems as though incest, rape and sado porn is corrupting. Who would have fucking guessed that?
(
After you my dear Alfonse No. After you., Fri 19 May 2017, 20:50,
Share,
Reply)
Mary Whitehouse
objected to strong language.
(
After you my dear Alfonse No. After you., Fri 19 May 2017, 21:43,
Share,
Reply)
she could have quite easily written this policy though
It's the Edwardian solution
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 22:06, Share, Reply)
You're being obtuse and you know it.
You see exactly how much things have changed in a generation.
Whitehouse worried about the word "shit".
We worry now about rape, paedophilia, FGM, etc.
(
After you my dear Alfonse No. After you., Fri 19 May 2017, 22:45,
Share,
Reply)
my point is that this is a policy designed by a coalition of people
Those who have an interest in protecting the vulnerable but very little idea about the internet or the nature of the problem (Whitehousian social conservatives) and those who have no interest in protecting the vulnerable but are keen to promote and retain their own financial interests (Murdoch).
Therefore it a) wont work as they claim b) isnt really designed to work as they claim
(, Fri 19 May 2017, 23:00, Share, Reply)
You think government operates in a bubble
But they have vast resources. The Digital Economy Act has been scrutinised, redrafted and cross-checked by people who know more about this subject than anyone in the world.
You think the media are colluding but Dacre is livid about this and Desmond is an actual porn baron. I don't know what Murdoch's line is. Neither do you.
Stop worrying. You'll still be able to get your goat porn. The point is that your children won't.
(
After you my dear Alfonse No. After you., Sat 20 May 2017, 7:56,
Share,
Reply)