Have you moved to a mid-US state yet?
It would be nice to get all the post-modern nazis in one place to keep an eye on them
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 13:48, Share, Reply)
It would be nice to get all the post-modern nazis in one place to keep an eye on them
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 13:48, Share, Reply)
Such a Libtard. Accuses me of Nazism for my opposition to an unelected autocratic elite.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 14:34, Share, Reply)
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 14:34, Share, Reply)
Oh look you've gone back to your terrifying imaginary EU monsters under the bed argument again, just like Farage - At least he has a transparent agenda to protect his own off-shore wealth when the EU have said that they would be going after tax avoidance schemes in earnest.
The EU parliament is elected, the rest of the structure is a civil service, who, just like the British Civil Service, are indeed unelected. Are you going to vote to leave the Civil Service next? Do you have a problem with the people that work in the houses of parliament that weren't elected?
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 14:53, Share, Reply)
The EU parliament cannot make it's own legislation. It can merely rubber stamp laws passed to it.
No MEP or group of MEPs can even introduce a bill. It is the Commission, your so called civil servants, that make all the laws. The idea that the parliament can reject any law put to them remains theoretical. If you actually believe the European Parliament has any power you are even more ignorant than you are arrogant.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:05, Share, Reply)
No MEP or group of MEPs can even introduce a bill. It is the Commission, your so called civil servants, that make all the laws. The idea that the parliament can reject any law put to them remains theoretical. If you actually believe the European Parliament has any power you are even more ignorant than you are arrogant.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:05, Share, Reply)
It doesn't remain theoretical, they can reject anything put to them. Next.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:07, Share, Reply)
It remains theoretical because they never have. Name a law they rejected. While studying EU law for an LLB I was repeatedly told the Parliament had never rejected a law put to them. So just give me a source. Not about the hypothetical procedure, but about an actual law that was rejected.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:25, Share, Reply)
https://www.hortweek.com/eu-parliament-rejects-invasive-species-ban/plant-health/article/1375640
www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20151022IPR98805/parliament-rejects-national-gmo-bans-proposal
There are loads.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:33, Share, Reply)
Laws are not the same as proposals.
That's so basic it's not even in constitutional law 101. Spastic.
Find something that was actually drafted as a law. Not a proposal, an actual law. Not like so much hot air you puff out of your gob.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:46, Share, Reply)
That's so basic it's not even in constitutional law 101. Spastic.
Find something that was actually drafted as a law. Not a proposal, an actual law. Not like so much hot air you puff out of your gob.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:46, Share, Reply)
How does something become a law?
It's proposed as a law! Here's a quote from the links above, which you clearly don't understand:
"A draft EU law that would enable any EU member state to restrict or prohibit the sale and use of EU-approved GMO food or feed on its territory was rejected by the European Parliament on Wednesday"
That's them rejecting a law. The ones that are current laws have not been rejected or they would not be laws you moron.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:58, Share, Reply)
It's proposed as a law! Here's a quote from the links above, which you clearly don't understand:
"A draft EU law that would enable any EU member state to restrict or prohibit the sale and use of EU-approved GMO food or feed on its territory was rejected by the European Parliament on Wednesday"
That's them rejecting a law. The ones that are current laws have not been rejected or they would not be laws you moron.
( , Fri 10 Nov 2017, 15:58, Share, Reply)