well
I can understand why the 17-Month Old, who, not seconds before was enjoying a game of peek-a-boo with his dad was taken away from him and placed in complete darkness would be traumatised by the experience.
Certainly being in the overhead locker would be dangerous, what if the plane hit some unexpected turbulence, the kid would have been thrown around like a sack of potatoes.
I can understand how the parents would be shocked, maybe scared for their child.
I can't understand why they would have been 'in shock', and 'devastated'. It's just hyperbole. Screams of artificially increasing the damage done in order to get a settlement...
(, Tue 8 Mar 2011, 11:41, Reply)