When the misogynist is not orange and not republican, the whore must have been asking for it
Especially if you are a big money donor.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 14:48, Share, Reply)
Especially if you are a big money donor.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 14:48, Share, Reply)
The fashion industry has always been the go-to choice whenit comes to addressing exploitation, sexual abuse and morals. Good to see them keeping up standards.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 14:57, Share, Reply)
Well, Mr. Weinstein himself claims he is a victim of a vast right wing conspiracy
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 15:06, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 15:06, Share, Reply)
There's always someone else to blame for the people at the top in the US
Nothing is ever their fault and it's all a conspiracy, not that they are poisonous disgusting fucks with no moral compass.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:13, Share, Reply)
Nothing is ever their fault and it's all a conspiracy, not that they are poisonous disgusting fucks with no moral compass.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:13, Share, Reply)
Personally, that any of this is surprising to anyone is beyond me.
In the US, basketball, football athletes, and singers and actors are not really who I would look to for morals. I think this is only news because many of those same people seem to have selective outrage
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:21, Share, Reply)
In the US, basketball, football athletes, and singers and actors are not really who I would look to for morals. I think this is only news because many of those same people seem to have selective outrage
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:21, Share, Reply)
I think with all the air time given to people like Madonna and Cher denouncing two men bragging about girls, it had to happen
The NYT had the same story in 2004 and they spiked it after complaints from Weinstein's people, which included calls from Matt Damon and Russell Crowe to the reporter. In other words, at least 13 of the 30 years of Weinstein's debauchery did not need to happen.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:47, Share, Reply)
The NYT had the same story in 2004 and they spiked it after complaints from Weinstein's people, which included calls from Matt Damon and Russell Crowe to the reporter. In other words, at least 13 of the 30 years of Weinstein's debauchery did not need to happen.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:47, Share, Reply)
Madonna and Cher? You've totally lost me there, but then again I don't watch US TV.
Yep, it's the same with Saville/Heath etc. As long as the money/fame train keeps rolling, they'll be protected.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:54, Share, Reply)
All those people in Hollywood are dying to get jobs. Why shouldn't they "show" how much they want the job?
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 15:47, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 15:47, Share, Reply)
this whole thing is weird
Why arent these celebs publicly condemning this sex pest? Perhaps because it's just a bloke they worked with once and they dont feel it's any of their business?
No, massive communist conspiracy again obvs.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:19, Share, Reply)
Why arent these celebs publicly condemning this sex pest? Perhaps because it's just a bloke they worked with once and they dont feel it's any of their business?
No, massive communist conspiracy again obvs.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:19, Share, Reply)
"don't feel it's any of their business?"
They seem to spout off about many things that really aren't their business. And I think you mean right wing conspiracy.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4953450/Harvey-Weinstein-right-wing-conspiracy-sex-shame.html
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:25, Share, Reply)
They seem to spout off about many things that really aren't their business. And I think you mean right wing conspiracy.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4953450/Harvey-Weinstein-right-wing-conspiracy-sex-shame.html
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:25, Share, Reply)
Trump you mean?
I suppose the difference is Weinstein isnt running for public office and hasnt been caught on tape boasting about it. He's just a fat bloke at the oscars
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:29, Share, Reply)
I suppose the difference is Weinstein isnt running for public office and hasnt been caught on tape boasting about it. He's just a fat bloke at the oscars
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:29, Share, Reply)
Good point: if he's not a right leaning politician and there is no video proof, it doesn't really matter; everyone does it
Big money donors should be untouchable.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:37, Share, Reply)
Big money donors should be untouchable.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:37, Share, Reply)
calm down love
I merely think Judy Dench should be free to offer or withhold her opinion on whatever she sexpest she likes. A right I'd extend to almost everybody outside a courtroom
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:18, Share, Reply)
I merely think Judy Dench should be free to offer or withhold her opinion on whatever she sexpest she likes. A right I'd extend to almost everybody outside a courtroom
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:18, Share, Reply)
I agree, unless Dame Judy Dench was supporting a particular political party or candidate, which my examples were.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:25, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:25, Share, Reply)
I cant find anything about Judy Dench condemning Trump either.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:35, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:35, Share, Reply)
Right. That's because it was you that brought up DJD, not I.
Nice try, Spanky.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:42, Share, Reply)
Nice try, Spanky.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:42, Share, Reply)
I think, since you brought her up, she did issue a statement after a few others had
"Whilst there is no doubt that Harvey Weinstein has helped and championed my film career for the past 20 years, I was completely unaware of these offences which are, of course, horrifying and I offer my sympathy to those who have suffered, and wholehearted support to those who have spoken out."
Sheesh, who knew you had such a bone for Dame Judy?
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:51, Share, Reply)
"Whilst there is no doubt that Harvey Weinstein has helped and championed my film career for the past 20 years, I was completely unaware of these offences which are, of course, horrifying and I offer my sympathy to those who have suffered, and wholehearted support to those who have spoken out."
Sheesh, who knew you had such a bone for Dame Judy?
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:51, Share, Reply)
so she's clean
How about this lot?
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964568/Shame-female-listers-refuse-denounce-Weinstein.html
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:54, Share, Reply)
How about this lot?
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964568/Shame-female-listers-refuse-denounce-Weinstein.html
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 17:54, Share, Reply)
See! This is the crap that makes a story about a boorish person into clickbait.
It seems the only safe space for anyone these days is to wait a bit to see which way the wind blows then jump on whatever bandwagon seems to have the most people.
As Dio put it so well, "when you listen to fools, the mob rules."
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 18:19, Share, Reply)
It seems the only safe space for anyone these days is to wait a bit to see which way the wind blows then jump on whatever bandwagon seems to have the most people.
As Dio put it so well, "when you listen to fools, the mob rules."
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 18:19, Share, Reply)
Is that literally an article listing people about which we have no information?
That's some top journalism right there.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 18:31, Share, Reply)
That's some top journalism right there.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 18:31, Share, Reply)
He's made people huge piles of money for other people
Those people don't give a shit about who he's touching and raping as long as their gravy train isn't disturbed. It's the american dream.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:31, Share, Reply)
Those people don't give a shit about who he's touching and raping as long as their gravy train isn't disturbed. It's the american dream.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:31, Share, Reply)
would it be possible that if it is a daily mail link, that we might be told in advance? Asking for a friend.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:37, Share, Reply)
I think BC's coming along, it could have easily been Fox News.
So, y'know, baby steps and all..
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 18:54, Share, Reply)
It's a lovely position to declare any news source that disagrees with one's point of view as illegitimate.
Indeed, had Drudge not been around to break the Clinton scandal, it may have never been reported. Wake up sheeple!
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 19:36, Share, Reply)
Indeed, had Drudge not been around to break the Clinton scandal, it may have never been reported. Wake up sheeple!
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 19:36, Share, Reply)
There's disagreeing opinions, and then there's breathtaking levels of bullshit. Wake up sheeple, indeed..
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 19:53, Share, Reply)
I get it. Your viewpoints are the first, mine are the latter. Convenient.
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 20:39, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 10 Oct 2017, 20:39, Share, Reply)