b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 305530 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

Sod it, I'm starting a daily poll. And by popular demand...
Maddy or Chips?
Mini poll bar
Mini poll bar
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 8:54, 13 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Maddie
She tasted better.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 8:55, Reply)
Totally off topic but a retarded question nontheless
You do type /all at the end of qotw to get them in order of popularity don't you? I'm trying it and it comes up fatal error.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:00, Reply)
I think
the b3ta overlords stopped it working...
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:03, Reply)
Third option...
Maddy AND chips. Nom.

Edit: I don't think the overlords even knew we knew about it. It wasn't really for us.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:03, Reply)
Maddy IS Chips?
perhaps?
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:22, Reply)
/all
someone posted about it on top tips and then shortly afterwards it stopped being available

it got spread around too much
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:31, Reply)
Well that sucks
Why does it matter if we know what the top posts were?
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:34, Reply)
probably means that people just read the top posts
which means that the ones already at the top get more clicks and others get missed out or skimmed over.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:41, Reply)
Oooh!
It's neck and neck!

*bounces*
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 9:56, Reply)
/all and popular posts
but you can do that with the image challenge.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 11:16, Reply)
Chips
take up less room in the boot of my car.
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 11:16, Reply)
How about
chucking Maddy in one of these, then you could have Maddy chips?

/gets coat
(, Tue 18 Nov 2008, 11:48, Reply)
Re: /all
It got broken round about the time the code monkeys were making loads of changes to the site. I doubt it was removed deliberately. More likely that it was missed out of the final code release. The error message indicates a missing chunk of code (an undefined function)...

If it was removed on purpose, well fuck you b3ta. It was a bloody handy tool for separating the wheat from the chaff.
(, Wed 19 Nov 2008, 7:02, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1