
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Frankly, I'm surprised Rob would show any support for your fucking archive of wasted time, which, at its heart, undermines a large and active chunk of his website and its loyal (often donating) users. The sheer hypocrisy of promoting stories one week by including them in the newsletter, then shooting them down by endorsing your pathetic witch hunt is baffling to me.
If your wanky list only targeted the truly worthless posts, I wouldn't have a problem with it, but you also shout "failure" at stuff that the rest of the site thinks is pretty good. To use just one example from your contemptible archive, SpankyHanky is a character on a web site; as far as I know, none of us has ever met him in person. The character in those stories is obviously not entirely real and the writer has never stated that *every* story is true (although I'm sure some of them are, some people just lead interesting lives). SpankyHanky's stories are simply a fucking funny diversion from the drudgery of work. That's all they need to be, 'truth' would add nothing to the entertainment factor. Since SpankyHanky arrived, QOTW has been a better place for it as evidenced by the huge number of posts he's got on the 'best of' pages. He's not the only one on your list who doesn't belong there either.
You spectacularly FAIL to see the point of QOTW. It's not a forum for dull accounts of precisely what happened, because the topics usually lack the scope for writing a true story that is also amusing (take note, mods). QOTW is a place to write funny, interesting anecdotal answers to the question. Some are true, some are made up. Why the fuck do you care if the plot comes from Real Lifeā¢ or from someone's imagination?
The only important criteria for QOTW should be "is it entertaining?". In that sense, you, not the posters of QOTW, consistently FAIL to deliver anything at all. Worst of all, you seem to be obsessed with creating resentment for a cherished place where bullshit, belly laughs, ridiculous bragging and occasionally, some very amusing truths live quite happily together. Your idiotic crusade is tiresome, pointless and it makes you look like a needy cunt. Too much time spent licking JMG's online balls has wrongly convinced you that you too can be a self-declared arbiter of what is and is not worthy of being accepted. JMG is at least pretty funny, for his sins.
( , Sat 31 Oct 2009, 6:06, 24 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

( , Sat 31 Oct 2009, 18:10, Reply)

I'm based in Tokyo, so you could have said 'CHINKY CUNT CAT' which would have been more amusing, if racially inaccurate.
Do let me know how you get on though.
( , Mon 2 Nov 2009, 16:06, Reply)

"ksssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
( , Sat 31 Oct 2009, 18:12, Reply)

If the QoTW doesn't apply to you, why give in to the sweaty, nervous need to post something? No-one will think any less of you for it. Chances are they won't even notice.
Don't make up some crap just so you can sit and constantly refresh the page and see if anyone has replied to it going "OMG that's so funneh! you're so cool!"
You're a bunch of needy, self indulgent, whining, emotionally retarded fuckwits (with the exception of "normal" posters) and you all seriously need to stop getting so upset if someone dares to criticize you or tells you to stop telling your filthy, dull lies.
Ps, You're also a cunt.
( , Sat 31 Oct 2009, 18:23, Reply)

He's a cunt though.
( , Sat 31 Oct 2009, 20:04, Reply)

You have to be kidding. I'm defending QOTW, not myself.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 11:33, Reply)

but then you subtracted all credibility from whatever point you were trying to make by joining in the name calling. Better luck next time.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 11:39, Reply)

it wouldn't apply to everyone.
btw: it's not called 'true story of the week' either
3/10 must try harder
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:11, Reply)

FLAWED LOGIC, CUNT.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 12:51, Reply)

I'm so fucking awesome I can knock shit like this together in minutes.
The flaw in the logic is the part where you tried to connect "waste of time" with my excellent and correct reply above. The volume of /talkhate it has generated is evidence that it was anything but a waste of time.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:19, Reply)

( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:22, Reply)

while making a 'whoosh' sound. You just missed the point.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:22, Reply)

( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 13:23, Reply)

Too much time spent licking JMG's online balls
You fucking crip
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:14, Reply)

A cursory glance through JMG's post history reveals AB's filthy brown nose. Pick any day you like really.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:19, Reply)

( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:21, Reply)

If it's all some massive joke, it's way too subtle. He just looks like a good old fashioned sycophant.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:27, Reply)

but subtle he most certainly isn't.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:36, Reply)

I was referring to the non-sublety of AB's attempts at emulating JMG's posting style, and his many congratulatory replies to JMG's missives
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:45, Reply)

It's all some hyper-layered in-joke that I'm far too stupid to understand.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 14:56, Reply)

It's basically a Special School version of Speak You're Branes or Lamebook, done really, really lazily.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:16, Reply)

he's wittering on about you and JMG now, not your list.
( , Sun 1 Nov 2009, 15:59, Reply)

It's just underlined text, but I can see how it's confusing... for some.
( , Mon 2 Nov 2009, 16:04, Reply)

doesn't that mean he gets the point of it?
Surely that is a good thing?
( , Thu 15 Jul 2010, 15:42, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread