b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Trapped! » Post 2227766 | Search
This is a question Trapped!

Pig Bodine asks: Where have you got stuck, trapped or tangled?

(, Fri 28 Feb 2014, 12:09)
Pages: Popular, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back

I got tangle up in a battle of wits where the opponent was only half prepared...
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:01, 143 replies)

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:04, closed)
15 - love

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:08, closed)
this will end well
*cough* rob fartgnome *cough*
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:11, closed)
Sounds like you've got a fat Ozzie in your throat.
Do your wife and kids know about this?
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:20, closed)

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 22:22, closed)

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 22:51, closed)

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:24, closed)
I don't think he's up to it.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:25, closed)
He does seem rather intent on duffing himself up in public.
We should definitely not vote for these posts to store them permanently in his profile or owt. Definitely not.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:26, closed)
You both know the rules.
Both participants will be lowered into a saltwater pool and the winner will be whoever's splashing manages to short-circuit the pub's Sky Sports.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:31, closed)
But you're certainly not being attention seeking and insecure about it, oh no.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:40, closed)
he's a bit upset about the whole thing

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:42, closed)
So any reply to your witless posts is being upset?
Aren't you being a bit lazy there? Please come up with something original dear boy.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:45, closed)
You're upset enough to feel compelled to keep defending yourself.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:47, closed)
And you're so weak willed that you'll feel compelled to reply as long as I go on.
Only difference is, I've got a life. From seeing the number of posts you put on here, I don't think you could claim the same.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:52, closed)
no i trol u lol

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:53, closed)
I have been well and truly Leglessed, I tell you.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:55, closed)
The best thing about this is that most of the lurkers have me, you, and badger on ignore
so to most readers this just looks like him having a mini nervous breakdown all on his own.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 19:14, closed)
Apropos of nothing
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 22:01, closed)
alwez in r harts

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 22:07, closed)
never a truer word said

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 14:50, closed)
We don't all type as slowly as you, flower.
Some of us have the benefit of using our hands rather than a dobber. And it's not much of a life if you've spent your entire day defending your creepiness against random pricks on the internet.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:54, closed)
All day? Nope.
Random pricks? I think we both agree there.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:56, closed)
Over a hundred posts. More than a third of them from you. All defending the fact that you sniff after your colleagues in confined spaces.
You've had a really productive Sunday. Assuming your to-do list began "make b3ta aware that I'm the creepy office sex pest".
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 19:08, closed)
Considering I started the thread, hardly surprising. Well, to an adult, it's not.
I'm sure if we look at stats on here we'd see you spend considerably more time on here than me. By a factor of a thousand, I should think.

I'm currently working, so while I'm at a computer I can switch between earning a good living and laughing at you. I suspect most posts from everyone else on this subject do not fall into that category.

So all you've proved really is "make b3ta aware I've not got a life".
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 20:41, closed)

working leering at Janet from accounts and rubbing my erection on my desk
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 21:22, closed)
Ah come on.
Surely of the hundred thousand registered users there's just one who will defend the creepy workplace perv.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 21:27, closed)

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 21:38, closed)
RabidRodent has presumably flounced off to pastures greener.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 21:45, closed)

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 9:57, closed)
Nobody works in accounts.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 13:28, closed)
Never understood the "I frequent this website but
If you come on it more than me you're a cunt." argument.
Seems to be a common defence on here, and if I may say so, an extremely sloppy one.
Perhaps we should just memeify it and be done.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 21:36, closed)
Doesn't look like you understand much at all, does it.
I wasn't the one that brought stats up. I was accused of spending more time on this thread than anyone. Just pointing out this isn't my life, like some people here.
When they start saying they've got 50 Facebook friends from on here, you know who the real ones that are getting upset are. I know no-one here, and have nothing at all to lose whatever. Unlike some I could mention...
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 0:20, closed)
Quick, post another rambling essay about how you're not upset and are so much better than everyone else.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 9:06, closed)
It appears that you are unable to answer a post without
resorting to personal insults and blaming others for your behaviour so this ends my dialogue with you.
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 9:08, closed)
You're very sexy when you're all masterful and mature.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 9:36, closed)
I'd love to just take the piss but I don't know how.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 12:40, closed)
Funnily enough
I was going to say the same about you.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 8:12, closed)
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:48, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:58, closed)
abloo bloo bloo i'm allowed on the internet and you're not.
jog on, you spastic. the sunshine coach is waiting.
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 9:58, closed)
Ahhh, you sound a tad upset
Couldn't you come up with something amusing instead of that?
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 8:05, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 11:00, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 17:54, closed)
You're so not upset that you're continuing this two days later.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 11:27, closed)
We're now at 86% Fairholme and rising.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 12:26, closed)
Wow. Topped your IQ then I see.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 17:54, closed)
At least you'll come away from this with a slightly better grasp of English. Even if it costs you every last shred of dignity.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:34, closed)
Down to typo corrections, eh?
I like to know how you think an anonymous poster has 'dignity' to lose. It's just a web site to post to with a random username. I can forget about you just by looking away from the screen.

The only one to lose any dignity is the poster that knows other people on this site IRL.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:08, closed)
Except everybody else here thinks you're a tragic office perv who's upset on the internet.
Not a single white knight has leapt to your defence. Even Rob Fairholme won occasional sympathy.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:19, closed)
Judging me by your standards, I see
I don't need acceptance here. Sounds like it's an important part of life on here for you though. Having a family and proper friends means I don't need this site like you do.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:24, closed)
But you do need to get your kicks sniffing after the girls at work in confined spaces.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:32, closed)
Your words, not mine
Although you admit to getting your kicks from teasing internet virgins...
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 7:03, closed)
"Having timed my perv correctly"
Your words, Lift Perv.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 7:31, closed)
And you're so sad
For continuing it too I see.
Get a life. Really.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 17:53, closed)
He's a good 60% angry Perth fatboy.
Another push and he could go Full Fairholme.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:46, closed)
Are you attempting to goad someone into going Full Felchmoan?
Sounds like entrapment to me.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:55, closed)
alright Gnostic Yeti

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:57, closed)
Guten Abend, Herr Feldmarschall

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 19:06, closed)
He's not exactly taken much goading.
I've had quite a busy day. The poor feck has done most of this to himself.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 19:00, closed)
Now, now
This is all a good laugh to me, but comparing someone to that Ozzie twunt is going a bit far. I'm sure you're the reason he had a 44,000 gallon swimming pool of salty tears.
(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 18:55, closed)
Alright Rick Fathelme.

(, Sun 2 Mar 2014, 19:39, closed)
The funny thing is...
...you probably think you're winning this.
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 10:22, closed)
You're just another poor victim of his sweet troll-trolling moves.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 10:27, closed)
Aren't you a bit sad
To believe anyone thinks they can 'win' on the internet?

It's not as if I'm dealing with reasonable people, is it.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 8:16, closed)
I'm not sure it's possible to win...
but you can certainly lose.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 8:23, closed)
It's back for more punishment. Maybe we can get both threads past the hundred posts mark.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 8:40, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 9:10, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 9:10, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 9:11, closed)
try (sorry for the 'gag' theft BD)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 9:11, closed)
I wouldn't worry.
He's got a whole drawer full of them. Leather straps, rubber balls, amyl-nitrite-soaked silk, the full set.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 9:44, closed)
The mucky bugger!

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 13:13, closed)
You've implied a pretty strong predicate...
...you're wrong if there is a single person using the internet who thinks they're winning an argument.
...whereas I'm wrong if there isn't a single person using the internet who thinks they're winning an argument.
On which would you put your money?


Also, in the title of your original post, you appear to have (with some hyperbole) called this a "battle of wits". And yet, no-one (especially not you) is trying to win this battle?
Are you telling us, that you didn't start this whole new thread, about a battle of wits, in order to try to win it?
If that IS what you're telling us, then I will nod slowly in agreement, and I promise not to scratch my chin ironically.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 13:57, closed)
It's like you put a lot of thought into that reply.

Was it worth it?
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 16:02, closed)
Not much thought.
Illogical shit, and how to rebut it, usually just jumps out instantly.

The only time required is to formulate unambiguous sentences such that lowest 5 percentile morons can still understand them.

Probably not.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 16:32, closed)
So much though. So little correct though.
Before you pat yourself on the back, this post isn't the reference to the battle of wits - so you got that one wrong before we even start.

This isn't a social network for me (unlike some). I don't have "50 friends on Facebook from this site" so I have nothing to win - or lose - whatever happens. I just switch to another tab on my browser and you're all forgotten.

Some, however, have certainly invested much of their life building up a presence here and are known to each other. My total of around 20 minutes of typing in the past few days hardly counts as any investment at all.

Oh, and by the way, you can't apply logical arguments here, seeing as any of my logical arguments have been met with silence or, in most cases, childish insults. You have to look at both sides before you can draw conclusions, but you haven't, so doesn't say much for your reasoning power, does it?
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 18:21, closed)
The word is 'thought', pervboy.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 19:01, closed)
You poor thing.
To deal with your fallacious reasoning point by point:

1# The OP of this thread is entitled "I got tangle up in a battle of wits where the opponent was only half prepared..."
The body of the OP of this thread links to, presumably, the "battle of wits" that you were trapped in, but which you claim you were not trying to win.

2# "I have nothing to win or lose because I don't care enough"
Simply not caring that you've lost doesn't mean you haven't lost. Lack of investment in an outcome does not change that outcome. You appear to be willfully mistaking the concept of "personal loss" which is your own subjective opinion, and about which no-one here cares, and "argument loss" which is what we were all talking about.

3# "Some people here have spent a lot of time here, [I'm inferring this next clause] so they've got something to lose"
Well, maybe they have. But regardless of what they MAY lose, none of them has lost the argument. Again... personal loss, and argument loss: different.

4# "You can't use logic here, because I tried it once, failed, and everyone either ignored me or insulted me."
But I can use logical arguments here:
1) Because logic remains correct, regardless of opinion
2) You've been so monumentally rubbish that your arguments can be crushed with only the most paltry amount of consideration.
3) I'm not you, so haven't marked myself out for excessive ridicule (ok, bring it on now, guys)

Incidentally, I get ignored quite a lot when demolishing, point-by-point, inadequates like yourself, because frankly it isn't very funny, and serves only as an exercise in making myself feel superior at the expense of someone else (you). I do it anyway because sometimes QOTW gets very slow, and the best entertainment to be had from it is picking on some deserving idiot (like yourself) and having at them for the fuck of it.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 20:45, closed)
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:02, closed)
I think, and type, fast
Besides that guy needs to be aware he's on the wrong side of the Dunning-Kruger gap.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:12, closed)
At least you tried
And you're putting a lot of effort (or typing a lot at least) into trying to prove a point. Unfortunately you got a few things wrong. Again.

Apart from not actually addressing some of my comments, you seem to be under the illusion there there is an argument going on in this thread. Obviously, and often by their own admission, many of the posts are just personal insults. You may think that's an argument, but with your flawed logic, anything is possible I suppose.

The initial supposition in point 4 invalidates the rest of the argument pretty much as you're applying opinion to set the state to which you apply logic.

I have to give it to you though, you are the only person to actually answer with anything more intelligent and original than "Your mum".

Shame it's not much more intelligent though.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 7:50, closed)

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 7:54, closed)
So you're still reading my posts?
And paying enough attention to then comment on the grammar?
Feels a bit creepy you stalking me like this.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:13, closed)
You're welcome.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:20, closed)
There is an argument.
Amazingly for someone who is apparently above the age of 5, you proved it by attempting to argue that there isn't. Any further attempt to deny this will count as barefaced lies.

Anyway, I have enumerated your failings, and pretty much addressed all the points you made, in order. You claim I'm incorrect but don't even have the common decency to provide evidence in support... you simply contradict, with no supporting evidence or reasoning, yet you treat your statements like facts. So, you're at around the middle of the argument pyramid. Which means that you're not outrageously awful, in the grand scheme of things, but you could definitely use some serious improvement.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 10:24, closed)
Oh dear, yet more waffle and litle thought.
Please tell me what the "Argument" here is then, that started all these posts. Go on. One fact I stated, that someone tried to counterpoint.

Seeing as most of the posts are personal insults, supposition or plain bollocks, I think you'll fail.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 7:09, closed)
n. an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.

Are you now saying that you entirely agree with everything I have said, or would you say your view is diverging and/or opposite? Either you entirely agree with me (that you're a total fucking idiot), OR you disagree and there is an argument.

Choose wisely, dickface.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 11:38, closed)
Let me explain, you've missed the point I've been trying to help you with here.

Most "views" here have merely been insults. If you're basing your view of someone on one post, or even replies to meaningless insults and deliberate misunderstandings, then your original view is very much on shaky ground, and you'd be the 'fucking idiot' as you put it.

You certainly can't claim Shambo et al have been even trying to put a serious view across. By their own admission they aren't trying to do that.

It wouldn't say this is an exchange of views at all - more like mud slinging to get a rise form someone. There is a difference you clearly have missed, and your desperation to be taken seriously then results to insults from yourself.

(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:05, closed)
I'm arguing that you're a fucking idiot.
Do you agree with me?

Three choices here:

1) You agree; you are an idiot, this is concluded with you being an idiot.

2) You disagree; you don't think you're an idiot, therefore we're having an argument. Therefore you're an idiot.

3) You continue replying, using verbal chicanery, making reference to stuff Shambo said as though it in some way undermines what I'm saying, then strut about declaring "I'm not having any arguments with anyone" in order to continue the argument. Which makes you an idiot.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:19, closed)
Is this a 5 minute argument, or the full half-hour?

(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:22, closed)
You've wasted five days on it, petal.
Imagine how many colleagues you could have creeped over in that time.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:34, closed)
Mere minutes of my life over a few days.
And getting you upset can hardly be called 'wasted'.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:39, closed)
Keep telling yourself that, pervboy.

(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:44, closed)
I don't have to
You seem keen to keep telling me yourself.
Like a bit of shit on my shoe, I can't can't get rid of you.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:48, closed)
Is it actually possible to argue with someone whose standard response to any post is ^upset? If it isn't how can you lose the argument? just saying
edit and no i don't mean you
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 11:44, closed)
^ upset

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 12:09, closed)
predictable :)

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 15:23, closed)
Yeah... of course it's possible.
It might not be possible to win.
It might not be very productive or meaningful.
You almost certainly will look like a berk.

But it's still an argument, and thus it is still possible to argue.

Fuck man, if you happen to be insane enough that you think a tree is talking to you, and you decide to verbally disagree with it, then it is entirely possible to argue with an inanimate object.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 13:23, closed)
^upset on the internet^

(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 7:29, closed)
You cry that everyone is insulting you with predicatble memes, yet to the one person who deigned to treat you like a human being (rather than an inappropriate puddle of watered-down piss) you proudly regurgitate the same insults.

You've lowered your own (already pitiful) standards to the point that every single insult you've leveled at your detractors is now applicable to yourself. You yourself have provided a mountain of evidence of your own idiocy, your willingness to sacrifice your own (already pitiful) principles, and your basic inability to read and comprehend very simple chains of logic.

In short, you've not only provided the final nail in your own coffin, you've most graciously beveled the corners, sanded it down, and triple coated it in varnish. My work here is finished.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 11:44, closed)
No'ffence like.
But everybody's work was done as soon as he told the interweb that he pervs over his female colleagues in the lift. Everything else is just pointless filler to ensure this goes on his perv permanent record.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 12:17, closed)
True enough...
...but the fun bit isn't when the dam cracks... it's when the flood waters devastate everything down stream.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 12:25, closed)
You are finished, yes.
True, you are the only person to give the slightest hint of a reasoned argument, even though there wasn't actually an argument to begin with.

Glad you saw the irony in reply to a post much in the same way everyone else here does. Your insight is amazing.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 13:48, closed)
Either you're pretending to be thick... or you're just thick.
Either way you're a twat.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:06, closed)
So few posts
For you to deteriorate to just slinging insults like the rest of them.

I expected something better.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:10, closed)
Yeah, but you deserve worse.
You haven't even attempted to raise your game, so why should I continue to explain, in painfully obvious detail, stuff that you're willfully choosing not to understand, or which you're incapable of understanding?

It can't be dumbed down further for you.

So, yeah, it is an insult, but it's not one of those meaningless "Hur hur, you're upset on the internet!" insults made by people who are trolling for the sake of trolling...
It is an "Oh dear, this guy is never going to stop being thick." insult made by someone who has actually tried to communicate meaningfully with another and genuinely discovered them to be impenetrably dense.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:12, closed)
I think listening to your flawed logic was enough, thank you.
But, I have to admit, you're the only one to reply with posts that sound like someone with an I.Q. higher than their shoe size. (Apart from the insults, obviously).

Edit : I do apologize for one or two deliberate misunderstandings just to get a rise out of you though. Isn't that what everyone does here for fun?
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:17, closed)
Let's not forget that he thinks it's every man's dream to sniff after girls in confined spaces.
I don't think it's constructive to judge him for lack of intelligence when we can just point and sneer at the self-confessed creepy office perv.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:32, closed)
But you confess to being an internet perv too.
Teasing internet virgins, homosexual banter, admitting sexual perversions...

Oh I see, only YOU can joke about things. It all becomes clear now.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:37, closed)
I don't sniff after my female colleagues in the lift.
Wherever you think you've managed to drag these threads, it's always going to come back to the fact that you're a creepy office perv and we're not. That makes us better than you. That's why we're mocking you. Endlessly. Without mercy or remorse.

Filthy little lift perv.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:42, closed)
I assume that's why I've attracted so much attention from you.

Sorry to burst your spunk bubble, but perv, no, not really. You of all people should understand exaggeration of events for comic effect.

Maybe I should have said "I saw a pretty girl in the lift and was happy to be in her presence, even for only a minute". Not as comical though and probably still open to deliberate misinterpretation.

You filthy little internet stalker, you.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:47, closed)
Is it really a "battle of wits"
if your opponent is just insulting you for cheap laughs?
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 10:36, closed)
and when the 'opponent' is 'everybody else on b3ta'

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 12:24, closed)
I do so love an underdog story.

(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 13:36, closed)
It's like The Littlest Hobo
except at the end he gets stuck in a pig bin and drowns on rotten cabbage juices.
(, Mon 3 Mar 2014, 13:50, closed)
I thought at the end of the Littlest hobo
He got his anus intruded by a B3TA mods finger
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 15:31, closed)
It's fine to insult me for cheap laughs
It's what B3TA appears to be all about. Just don't try to pretend it's anything but when it suits you. Sort of backfires on you.

The pseudo-intellectual nit-picking I've been receiving is what's making me laugh the most though. Please keep up supplying me with ammo.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 18:24, closed)
I'll be honest:
I have no idea what you're on about.
Still, everyone on here makes a tit of themselves, now and then, so welcome to the club.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 21:57, closed)
They're not often upset enough that they weep on about it for two hundred posts though.
You have to give him credit for that.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:12, closed)
Weeping with laughter more like it.
Oh I forgot, when someone else posts a reply it's because they're upset. When you post it's because you're just being witty.

You're sounding delusional AND needy.
(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:29, closed)

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:31, closed)
I love it when a plan comes together.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 9:28, closed)
Terrible bullying of the Lift Sniffer.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 10:13, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 14:13, closed)
I'm hoping he meant penises.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 14:19, closed)
just don't cross the streams

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 14:34, closed)
I'm sure I'd be outgunned if it was.
You've probably got two in your hands right now.
(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 18:25, closed)
Don't start perving on me too, pervo.

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 19:02, closed)

(, Tue 4 Mar 2014, 18:27, closed)
Hey. Just because he sniffs after his colleagues in the work lift doesn't mean he's a lonely neckbeard.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 8:20, closed)

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 12:27, closed)
Fucking Johnny-come-lately jumping on the Lift Perv bandwagon.

(, Wed 5 Mar 2014, 14:01, closed)
Welcome to day 5 of the KipperFillets Vs Shambles 'upset-on-the-internet-a-thon'
It's been a long and arduous journey for both hard-hitting competitors. There have been laughs, tears, and unforgivable grammatical errors.

I wish I knew how to set up one of those vote things*, then perhaps we could decide the winner** once and for all before the question closes.

* Or could be arsed to
** Perhaps there should be a 3rd option where they're both losers?
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 9:27, closed)
Fortunately I'm posting between working, and as I know no-one here and don't have "50 friends on Facebook from here", have nothing to lose.
I can even admit to fiddling with pigs or drop this random anonymous name and lose nothing.

That can't be said of everyone here (although I suspect the pig-fiddling thing possibly could be).
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 14:09, closed)
The mods might finger dogs' arseholes, but I'm sure we'd all draw the line at piggy fiddling.
Epic reply count, BTW, you must be so proud.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 15:49, closed)
Proud? No. Amazed how easy it is to get people wound up, yes.

BTW Where do I go to convert these to Nectar points?
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 15:55, closed)
You've posted more in these threads than everybody else put together, liftsniffer.
Bit late to play the Legless 'no i trol u' card, pervo.
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 16:02, closed)
You sound rather desperate
If you've resorted to accusing someone of using the "Legless card".

Although, look back at some of the early posts and tell me you think I wasn't taking the piss out of you...
(, Thu 6 Mar 2014, 16:05, closed)
Awww. The Lift Perv has deleted his Pervo thread.

(, Fri 7 Mar 2014, 16:20, closed)
As if things magically disappear from the interweb.

(, Fri 7 Mar 2014, 16:22, closed)
Aww I though I'd get more of a reaction than that.
Some sort of self-proclaimed victory, like "I am Shambolic - hear me roar on a little part of the internet!".

Anyhow, once I realized I couldn't convert the reply count to Nectar points there didn't seem much point.
(, Fri 7 Mar 2014, 16:26, closed)
derpity derp
(, Fri 7 Mar 2014, 16:41, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Popular, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1