I believe that some people will do whatever they think they can do without come back just 'cos they can,if you don't give consequences to them that instill fear or loss, these people without empathy just feel they are better than everyone else and will NEVER learn, they will simply lie and do and say whatever they feel is needed to achieve their goal, I truly believe this man is one of those, conscience free he feels might is right so long as he gets away with it, as such I don't think he should!
(
..wil,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 0:36,
archived)
Wouldn't that be prison?But that's assuming this man hasn't got deep seated mental issues. Personally I think Monkeon said it best above, although I don't think by "no easy answers" as he put it one should consider a simple one such as capital punishment.
(
Christian's Bolt and Ski,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 1:07,
archived)
Prison is good, but I don't personally believe in human rights extending into the realm of those who absolve themselves of normal law, empathy and social respect,but we all know this case will anyway, it is given to all. I don't know, in all seriousness, eye for an eye, would it be so wrong here? It would deter! But would it work!? It might? Is that question so wrong? TBH I just don't know, but from personal experience, I do know, if someone has absolved themselves from empathy, conscience and consequence, maybe we need to intervene and change that? And that would mean what!? I know the answer...
( ..wil,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 1:28,
archived)
I tend to look at the lack of deterrence that capital punishment provides abroad to doubt its effectiveness.And then I defer to Gandhi on occasion too. Additionally it's kind of offensive on a level where the state has the ability to take away your life, moreover I don't like the idea of a legal fuck up, sending a wrongly convicted man to death row.
( Christian's Bolt and Ski,
Sat 10 Jul 2010, 2:02,
archived)