![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Crucial Design Flaws"){kind=small}
From the Crucial Design Flaws challenge. See all 138 entries (closed)
(, Fri 8 Jul 2011, 0:32, archived)
Quite.I'm fairly exhausted by defending my profession from the opprobium aimed correctly at these fuckers.
But hey, I'm here now. If anyone has a question.
(But hey, I'm here now. If anyone has a question.
Sea Tramp the thinking woman's 8 Ace,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:07,
archived)
Why is the NOTW the only newspaper brought down by the phone "hacking" scandal?Most of us know that this practice was widespread amongst investigative journalists. Personally I'd rather see The Daily Mail dead.
(
Shlvng,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:46,
archived)
Give it time. There's plenty of dirty laundry to come out yet.I imagine other papers won't emerge from this with clean hands either.
Now the cat's out of the bag, it's as if a cat has suddenly emerged from a bag. After being kept in a bag for a very long time.
(Now the cat's out of the bag, it's as if a cat has suddenly emerged from a bag. After being kept in a bag for a very long time.
Sea Tramp the thinking woman's 8 Ace,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 1:59,
archived)
Thanks for my new favourite word : opprobium.I shall use it often.
( Shlvng,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 2:14,
archived)
It was good for a laugh in traffic today.News on the radio of NoW's fate was accompanied by someone saying "168 years of tradition. . ." I didn't hear the rest as I laughed "yeah, they said something similar about Barings Bank, too."
No questions yet, but I would not be surprised if you are preparing an entry for this QOTW.
(No questions yet, but I would not be surprised if you are preparing an entry for this QOTW.
Felis Concolor,
Fri 8 Jul 2011, 3:22,
archived)