Should I provide some more links?Or would you prefer that I draw you a pretty picture with crayons?
(,
Fri 10 Oct 2003, 17:30,
archived)
From your own fucking link you tagnut:The first car manufacturers in the world were French: Panhard & Levassor (1889) and Peugeot (1891). By car manufacturer we mean builders of entire motor vehicles for sale and not just engine inventors who experimented with car design to test their engines - Daimler and Benz began as the latter before becoming full car manufacturers and made their early money by licensing their patents and selling their engines to car manufacturers.
(,
Fri 10 Oct 2003, 17:37,
archived)
What did you not understand aboutclarification I made above? "As we know it today"... do you get that? He was the first person to make vehicles available to the common man. If it weren't for Ford, the automobile would be as widespread as jet aircraft. Plenty of them around for businesses and the extremely rich, but you can't afford one.
Can I make it any clearer? Possibly use smaller words?
(,
Fri 10 Oct 2003, 17:52,
archived)
Can I make it any clearer? Possibly use smaller words?
Very childishHaving realised that the argument is lost, it is in particularly poor sport to redefine your initial statement. It is also a bemusing strategy on a blog where the whole argument is laid bare. I refer you to my initial post.
EDIT - Shit - I didn't think you'd be as low as to go back and edit your initial argument. Pussy.
(,
Fri 10 Oct 2003, 18:00,
archived)
EDIT - Shit - I didn't think you'd be as low as to go back and edit your initial argument. Pussy.
Nearly as childish asdouble posting, straying from the point I was trying to make in my initial post, and looking so closely for things to misinterpret that you miss the fact that I ammended my statement before you posted initially.
(,
Fri 10 Oct 2003, 18:05,
archived)