'This 'Other Worlds' idea is confusing to me, Pan'
From the Meanwhile, in a parallel universe... challenge. See all 465 entries (closed)
( , Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:28, archived)
From the Meanwhile, in a parallel universe... challenge. See all 465 entries (closed)
( , Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:28, archived)
if there are an infinite number of parallel universes,
then there are some where there are no other parallel universes
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:29,
archived)
But but but....
SPLOSH!
*mind explodes in a dripping puddle of goo.*
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:36,
archived)
*mind explodes in a dripping puddle of goo.*
there are some where there is no such thing as a parallel universe
meaning they exist individually.
Infinity really allows for absolutely everything no matter how improbable. - Douglas Adams taught me that ;)
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:41,
archived)
Infinity really allows for absolutely everything no matter how improbable. - Douglas Adams taught me that ;)
listen very carefully
there are some WHAT, or, another way: what are there some of?
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:43,
archived)
some of these things are not like the other
now it's time to play our game
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:53,
archived)
Are you arguing
for Universes inside Universes, like branches coming from the main trunk of a tree?
A Reverend and a Professor discussing parallel universes. Could end in a punch-up.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:45,
archived)
A Reverend and a Professor discussing parallel universes. Could end in a punch-up.
I think 'infinite' is an easy cop-out
unprovable either way so it keeps the scientists 'on the gravy train for life'.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:54,
archived)
Hmmm,
that argument could collapse in on itself, creating a singularity and a way into a parallel universe.
So, QED. I think...
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:40,
archived)
So, QED. I think...
hah
Nice one man chevron. But what does it mean?!!!
*Head explodes again*
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:45,
archived)
*Head explodes again*
it's not really a chevron is it.
it never comes back on itself.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:53,
archived)
when it was first made the server didn't have a time out thing for it
so it would keep going on and on and on heading out into the infinite wastes of the browser. Technically it is a fully filled solid chevron because every reply has an infinite number of replies but because the top layer of the chevron never finishes it can't start on the next.
Actually that would make it a rhombus.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 10:57,
archived)
Actually that would make it a rhombus.