b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 542756 (Thread)

# Anyway, my experience to date has been...
Windows 95:
3Com Etherlink III installed
Red Hat 6:
No Network Card
OpenBSD:
No Network Card
Me no likey viddy card

Windows 98:
3Com Etherlink III installed
Red Hat 6.2:
No Network Card

Windows 2k:
3Com Etherlink III installed
Red Hat 7:
Network Card installed.
Network turned of 1 week later.

It's an Etherlink III! HOW can you not accept it as a 3Com Etherlink III compatible! It IS an Etherlink III.
Linux is overrated, Windows isn't. Nice consumer system. And yes, I have run BSDs as well as Linux.
(I helped save b3ta! bigdave, Sun 8 Dec 2002, 23:26, archived)
# my webserver's got
an etherlink III and it's always been perfectly happy no matter what OS I've fed it.....
Actually that's a fib. It's now got a 3COM 3C905B (I think) 'cos the Elink III died, but the statement still stands. Actually, under 95 I'm surprised you didn't have grief with the Elink, 'cos I did.....
(I helped save b3ta! witchy is covered in BEES, Sun 8 Dec 2002, 23:34, archived)
# First network card I got was
"Network Card" and was shite as a very shite thing. I then got a proper 3Com jobbie and never had a problem, but Red Hat never ever accepted it right up until I put RH7 on, when it went "3Com Etherlink III installed. Configure?"
Could I configure it myself before hand? Could I buggery!
(I helped save b3ta! bigdave, Sun 8 Dec 2002, 23:44, archived)
# Ah, well, I got no experience of
RedHat earlier than 7.1, which is what I'm using. Dabbled with Slackware before that but I wasn't interested in networking it at that point.....now it's easier than an easy thing on easy street.
(I helped save b3ta! witchy is covered in BEES, Mon 9 Dec 2002, 0:01, archived)