it never ceases to amaze me
that it's illegal (GBH) to mutilate a baby girl's genitals but perfectly legal to do it to a baby boy
some fucking double standard there
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 19:58,
archived)
some fucking double standard there
Cos the girls won't feel anything any more, we still feel something, trust me...
but yeah, it's a bit weird.
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 20:03,
archived)
There is a difference though.
Cutting of the foreskin vs. cutting away the labia and gouging out the clitoris & sowing everything to stop the dirty woman from ever having sexual pleasure.
/serious mode
Edit - male circumcision still sucks though.
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 20:06,
archived)
/serious mode
Edit - male circumcision still sucks though.
yes
one is mutilating a baby
and the other is er...
mutilating a baby
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 20:08,
archived)
and the other is er...
mutilating a baby
It's
like the difference between cutting off a finger and cutting off the whole arm.
There is a fucking massive difference in scale.
A circumcised penis is still perfectly functional, for one thing.
But yeah, both are mutilation if not medically required.
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 20:10,
archived)
There is a fucking massive difference in scale.
A circumcised penis is still perfectly functional, for one thing.
But yeah, both are mutilation if not medically required.
justify it to yourself if you like
but anybody tries to cut my "finger" off and I'll be taking a driving iron to their skull
edit: *sees your edit, calms down, puts away golf clubs* :D
( ,
Thu 2 Nov 2006, 20:12,
archived)
edit: *sees your edit, calms down, puts away golf clubs* :D