you should addthat when you got the bookshop you saw a book that looked interesting by someone you'd never heard of but you bought it anyway, so a new writer made more money to encourage them to carry on writing and eventually produce the next great British novel.
or would that be over-egging the pudding?
(,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:32,
archived)
or would that be over-egging the pudding?
nopedidn't do that. I went it. Bought the book. Read most of it whilst my g/f was waiting in vodaphone trying to get her phone working. and then left it in the bog.
(
rob,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:35,
archived)
maybe he's signed up with the onlinebooksharingclubthing
(
Professor Fnord Regius Professor of B3ta Chronology,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:42,
archived)
I saw thatso I left all my porn mags outside the churches
So far none of the priests have passed them on
(So far none of the priests have passed them on
K3rry,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 20:00,
archived)
And heaven forbid that companiesshould spend large amounts of money to court your favour into buying things. No, how dare they...
( mikemystery blames the parents,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:36,
archived)
face itthe general public hate advertising. yes, there's all sorts of hypocrisy in that. but it's gonna take more than another ad campaign to change it.
( rob,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:38,
archived)
What advertising as a whole?All adverts? None of them make you laugh even remotely? Not even a small wry smile? Not even one ad you have seen that made you happy? Sure?
( mikemystery blames the parents,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:42,
archived)
nooI mean the public has a general antipithy to avdertising, whilst enjoying some ads at the same time.
( rob,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 19:46,
archived)