From the Creationism challenge. See all 281 entries (closed)

( Afinkawan www.folkon.co.uk, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:32, archived)

anyone can be a scientist
but it takes a true nutjob to be religious
( HappyToast B3ta Art Auction http://b3ta.com/links/749374, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:34, archived)

are you calling the pope a nutjob?

weeeell, I'm going to bed now. G'night b3ta!
( mediocre FISTING FULL THROTTLE, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:34, archived)

yes

( HappyToast B3ta Art Auction http://b3ta.com/links/749374, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:35, archived)

alright then

( mediocre FISTING FULL THROTTLE, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:35, archived)

who wouldn't?

( but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all foreskin of the apocalypse, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:38, archived)

and a complete mentalist to pretend to actually be a god.

( Thor_sonofodin Sent from my Nokia 9210 Communicator, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:35, archived)

shut it mortal!

( HappyToast B3ta Art Auction http://b3ta.com/links/749374, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:39, archived)

*readies smiting hammer*

( Thor_sonofodin Sent from my Nokia 9210 Communicator, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:40, archived)

Some sort of knowledge of
scientific method is often thought to be a pre-requisite for being a scientist.
( Afinkawan www.folkon.co.uk, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:35, archived)

nonsense!
all you need:
1 white coat
1 test tube
1 gilson
some sheets of graph paper and a pencil
( The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:41, archived)

Scientist?
I'm a scientist. What is a gilson?
( littlefish is at the cutting edge..... ow!, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:58, archived)

a type of automated pipette I think
(I'm actually a computer based scientist! :)
( The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:14, archived)

Sadly not
automated...entirely thumb work

/biochemist
( The4thCrystal Wishes he was better at photographamising..., Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:18, archived)

nay!
Log-log paper is required for true science.
If it's graph paper you're just pretending.
( The4thCrystal Wishes he was better at photographamising..., Wed 13 Jun 2007, 23:01, archived)

mmmmmm...
...Gilson
(crookedjon, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 10:10, archived)

He is a proper scientist.
He's just a poor philosopher.
(Pie of Meat ___°¬¯O¯____\o/_____/\_,____Y¯¯Y, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:39, archived)

To be fair
He's pretty poor at both! Just slightly better at science.
(Adamish Time of death, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 21:04, archived)

haven't read that book yet
should probably read his one about god first

edit: just in case someone thought i was talking bollox
(cs192 is sucking on a Koala at, Wed 13 Jun 2007, 22:51, archived)