double standards?

but only for large scale corporate charity
( LP, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:04, archived)

I'm beginning to like this challenge
if it can be subverted to a "greenpeace are twats" challenge it'll be fantastic. Well. Better anyway.
(numlockers, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:06, archived)

and that
would make this an un-fluffy place.
not what I want and I'm sure some others would agree.
( jiva nearly always up for a game of scrabble, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:08, archived)

How ould that make this
an un-fluffy place, anymore than saying "George Bush, etc are thwats"?

They're all politicians.
(Indole Ring, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:10, archived)

Although GW etc are (theoreticaly) elected
& Greenpeace aren't...
( thirdman Ia! Ia! R'lyeh Cthulhu ftagn! Ia! Ia! Mglui nafl, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:21, archived)

I'm actaully thinking through this compo
If we enter, do we implicitly give Greepeace permision to use our images? Thing is, I don't agree with quite a lot of their campaigns. I don't want to be associated with them.
(Al! is constantly suprised, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:06, archived)

who cares? greenpeace are twats..
[edit] - "i think"
(m4tt, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:09, archived)

precisely
I don't want my work being used by them.
(Al! is constantly suprised, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:11, archived)

take it on the chin
your chin needs you..
(m4tt, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:14, archived)

so don't
post any.

BOYCOTT WORLD PEACE!

erm
( Oscar Wildebeest, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:24, archived)

Especially the GM crops thing
Western paternalism at its WORST
( mikemystery professional bandwagoneer, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:10, archived)

I think
I'll combine GM foods, and my lack of enthusiasm for the greenpeace challenge... and...
spend all week making robots out of vegetables!!!
( LP, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:30, archived)

as long
as they are peaceful robots
( Oscar Wildebeest, Fri 31 Jan 2003, 12:36, archived)