yes,
because 15 years ago (edit - sorry, 20, 1994) it would take an hour to calculate this 3d image:
whereas that video is calculating 25 frames a second at that high resolution and complexity of light bouncing/realism
Creator : @IamHappyToast
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:24,
Share,
Reply)
Not that one.
That's just one quad with texture and bump map, a point source, ambient sphere and metallic cylinder. 15 seconds tops.
(, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 16:58, Share, Reply)
if you bumped up the yadda pixels and incorporated fluff core peogramming, then you could recompexulate the picture in less than 3 seconds.
(, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:01, Share, Reply)
Then shout "ENHANCE!" at it?
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:06,
Share,
Reply)
I wang all my images into Instagram.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 18:16,
Share,
Reply)
So do i, then i Tweet the pictures on Teletext.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 18:48,
Share,
Reply)
I understand where you're going with this but can't make out what you're saying as your head is firmly up your arse.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:10,
Share,
Reply)
sorry, I forgot it's 2014, it's 20 years since I made an image like that that took over an hour to render
I think it was an hour and 20 minutes to be precise, in 3d Studio v3
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 2 Sep 2014, 17:18,
Share,
Reply)