you say that like you could find any society of any size and system that hasn't involved suffering and slaughter in it's running..
(
tickle I was away, Tue 25 Nov 2014, 14:24,
Share,
Reply)
I'm not saying a capitalist democracy doesn't cause suffering and slaughter
I'm saying on average, looking at its implication around the world, it causes less suffering than the alternatives, namely of fascist and communist states. In essence I'm agreeing with what Churchill said about it being "the worst form of government, but better than all the others"
There have been studies that show how living without money/in a sharing society cannot possibly work beyond a certain size. Human nature doesn't permit it.
(, Tue 25 Nov 2014, 15:02, Share, Reply)